% This file was created with JabRef 2.4. % Encoding: ISO8859_1 @INPROCEEDINGS{vanHeel:03, author = {Evert {van Heel} and Tom M. {van Engers}}, title = {GoldminePower: Decisions in Governmental Process Design}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2003: The Sixteenth Annual Conference.}, year = {2003}, editor = {D. Bourcier}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {71-80}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS Press}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j03-08.pdf} } @INCOLLECTION{deMaat:08, author = {E. {de Maat} and R. Winkels and T. {van Engers}}, title = {{Making Sense of Legal Texts}}, booktitle = {Formal Linguistics and Law}, publisher = {Mouton, De Gruyter}, year = {2008}, editor = {G. Grewendorf and M. Rathert}, series = {Trends in Linguistics - Studies and Monographs (TiLSM)}, address = {Berlin}, month = {(in press)} } @ARTICLE{vanDenNieuwelaar:03a, author = {M.J.J. {van den Nieuwelaar} and T.M. {van Engers}}, title = {De Belastingdienst als kennisintensieve organisatie}, journal = {Controllers-bulletin}, year = {2003}, note = {To be published}, owner = {rinke} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanGog:01a, author = {R. {van Gog} and T.M. {van Engers}}, title = {Modeling Legislation using Natural Language Processing}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics}, year = {2001}, owner = {rinke} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vandeVen:08b, author = {Saskia {van de Ven} and Joost Breuker and Rinke Hoekstra and Lars Wortel and Abdallah {El-Ali}}, title = {Automated Legal Assessment in OWL 2}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2008: The 21st Annual Conference}, year = {2008}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, month = {December}, publisher = {IOS Press}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2008.10.29} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vandeVen:08a, author = {Saskia {van de Ven} and Rinke Hoekstra and Joost Breuker and Lars Wortel and Abdallah El-Ali}, title = {Judging {Amy}: Automated Legal Assessment using {OWL} 2}, booktitle = {Proceedings of {OWL}: Experiences and Directions (OWLED 2008 EU)}, year = {2008}, month = {October}, abstract = {One of the most salient tasks in law is legal assessment, and concerns the problem of determining whether some case is allowed or disallowed given an appropriate body of legal norms. In this paper we describe a system and Prot\'eg\'e 4 plugin, called OWL Judge, that uses standard OWL 2 DL reasoning for legal assessment. Norms are represented in terms of the LKIF Core ontology, as generic situation descriptions in which something (state, action) is deemed obliged, prohibited or permitted. We demonstrate the design patterns for defining the norms and actual cases. Furthermore we show how a DL classifier can be used to assess individual cases and automatically generate a lex specialis exception structure using OWL Judge. We illustrate our approach with a worked-out example of university library regulations.}, owner = {vandeven} } @INCOLLECTION{vandeVen:08, author = {Saskia {van de Ven} and Rinke Hoekstra and Radboud Winkels and Emile {de Maat} and \'Ad\'am Kollar}, title = {{MetaVex}: Regulation Drafting meets the Semantic Web}, booktitle = {Computable Models of the Law. Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.}, publisher = {Springer Verlag}, year = {2008}, editor = {Giovanni Sartor and Pompeu Casanovas}, volume = {4884}, series = {Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence}, pages = {42--55}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_3}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2008.06.16} } @PHDTHESIS{vanEngers:01c, author = {T.M. {van Engers}}, title = {Knowledge Management: The Role of Mental Model in Business Systems Design}, school = {Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam}, year = {2001}, note = {Belastingdienst}, owner = {rinke} } @UNPUBLISHED{vanEngers:97, author = {T.M. {van Engers}}, title = {Management issues in complex systems design}, note = {Internal publication for COST}, year = {1997}, owner = {rinke} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:05, author = {Tom {van Engers} and Ron {van Gog} and Arian Jacobs}, title = {How Technology Can Help Reducing the Legal Burden}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2005: The Eighteenth Annual Conference}, year = {2005}, editor = {Marie-Francine Moens and Peter Spyns}, volume = {134}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {101-102}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS Press} } @ARTICLE{vanEngers:01a, author = {T.M. {van Engers} and E. Glass\'ee}, title = {Facilitating the Legislation Process Using a Shared Conceptual Model}, journal = {IEEE Intelligent Systems}, year = {2001}, volume = {16}, pages = {50-58}, number = {1}, month = {January/February}, doi = {10.1109/5254.912385}, owner = {rinke} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:99a, author = {T.M {van Engers} and P.J.M. Kordelaar}, title = {{POWER}: Programme for an Ontology Based Working Environment for modeling and use of Regulations and Legislation}, booktitle = {Proceedings of ISMICK'99}, year = {1999}, note = {ISBN: 2-913-923-02-X}, owner = {rinke} } @ARTICLE{vanEngers:99b, author = {{van Engers}, T. and P. Kordelaar}, title = {(Em)POWERment}, journal = {Recht \& Elektronische Media}, year = {1999}, volume = {4}, pages = {2-3}, number = {3}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2007.05.07} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:00c, author = {T.M. {van Engers} and P.J.M. Kordelaar and J. Den Hartog and E. Glass\'ee}, title = {{POWER}: Programme for an Ontology based Working Environment formodeling and use of Regulations and legislation.}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11th workshop on Databases and Expert SystemsApplications (IEEE)}, year = {2000}, editor = {Tjoa and Wagner and Al-Zobaidie}, pages = {327-334}, address = {Greenwich London}, note = {ISBN: 0-7695-0680-1}, abstract = {The Dutch Tax and Customs Administration (DCTA) conducted a research programme in which methods were developed that support a systematic translation of (new) legislation into the DTCA's processes. In the POWER programme, the knowledge capitalization/knowledge codification approach is combined with an organization dynamics approach in which the DTCA's knowledge processes are aligned. As a result, the DTCA will be able to improve the quality of law enforcement and decrease the time needed for implementing changes in legislation and regulations. We think that the POWER method can be applied in many other governmental situations and perhaps even in non-government organizations where regulations play an important role (e.g. process industries, assurance companies etc.).}, doi = {10.1109/DEXA.2000.875047}, owner = {rinke} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:01d, author = {T.M. {van Engers} and Liane Vork and Herre {van Oostendorp}}, title = {Knowledge Productivity in a Complex Task Setting}, booktitle = {Proceedings of ISMICK'01}, year = {2001}, owner = {rinke} } @INCOLLECTION{vanEngers:00a, author = {T.M. {van Engers} and L. Vork and M.C. {Puarta Melguizo}}, title = {Kennisproductiviteit in groepen}, booktitle = {Opleiding \& Ontwikkeling, Elsevier Bedrijfsinformatie}, publisher = {Elsevier}, year = {2000}, note = {ISSN: 0922-0895}, journal = {Human Resource Development}, owner = {rinke} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:01b, author = {Tom M. {van Engers} and Rik Gerrits and Margherita Boekenoogen and Erwin Glass\'ee and Patries Kordelaar}, title = {{POWER}: Using {UML/OCL} for Modeling Legislation - an application report}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law}, year = {2001}, pages = {157-167}, publisher = {ACM Press}, note = {1-58113-368-5/01/0005}, abstract = {The Dutch Tax and Customs Administration (DTCA in Dutch: Belastingdienst) conducts a research program POWER in which methods and tools are developed that support a systematic translation of (new) legislation into the DTCA's processes. The methods and tools developed help to improve the quality of (new) legislation and codify the knowledge used in the translation processes in which legislation and regulations are transformed into procedures, computer programs and other designs. Thereby the time-to-market of the implementation of legislation will be reduced. In this article we focus on the method we developed for modeling legislation. We will elaborate upon the principles behind the method and explain the use of Catalysis and UML/OCL in the modeling process. The coupling of models of legislation and task models originating from business policy is demonstrated and finally we will show the way knowledge-based components in function of applications are generated automatically.}, doi = {10.1145/383535.383554}, owner = {rinke} } @TECHREPORT{vanEngers:07b, author = {Tom M. {van Engers} and Radboud Winkels}, title = {A Design Approach to Law: Research Plan 2007-2010}, institution = {Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam}, year = {2007}, type = {Leibniz Center Technical Report}, number = {1}, month = {May}, owner = {hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/reports/Research_Plan_2007_v1.0.pdf}, timestamp = {2007.08.15} } @TECHREPORT{Aamodt:92a, author = {A. Aamodt and B. Bredeweg and J. Breuker and C. Duursma and C. L{\"o}ckenhoff and K. Orsvarn and J. Top and A. Valente and W. van der Velde}, title = {The {CommonKADS} {L}ibrary}, institution = {KADS Consortium}, year = {1992}, type = {Deliverable 1.3.}, number = {KADS-II/T1.3/VUB/TR/005/1.0}, address = {Free University, Brussels} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Arendsen:06a, author = {R. Arendsen and T.M. van Engers and R. te Velde}, title = {An Emperical Study on Business-to-Government Data Exchange Strategies to Reduce the Administrative Costs for Businesses}, booktitle = {Project E-Society: Building Bricks, 6th IFIP Conference on e-Commerce, e-Business and e-Government (I3E 2006)}, year = {2006}, editor = {R. Suomi and R. Cabral and J. Hampe and A. Heikkila and J. Jarvelainen and E. Koskivaara}, volume = {226}, series = {IFIP International Federation for Information Processing}, pages = {311-323}, address = {Boston}, publisher = {Springer}, abstract = {In recently developed policies the electronic exchange of data with governmental organisations is seen as a means to help reduce the administrative burden for businesses. Even laws have become active to enforce electronic data filing. However, we do not know whether these eGovemment applications do help reduce the administrative burden, so we do not know whether this new legislation is effective either, Although many business-to-government systems are currently being implemented, the adoption of these data interchange systems in a governmental context has not yet been studied extensively. In the study reported in this paper we investigate data exchange related adoption strategies in order to be able to address (in)effective strategies for the reduction of the administrative burden. We present an analysis of adoption factors that influence adoption decisions of SME companies in this context. Based on a representative survey we found some factors that seem to be relevant for the (non)adoption of business-to-government data exchange systems. We found that especially small companies tend to outsource eGovernment related data exchange processes. Therefore we conclude that it is very unlikely that the governments aims to reduce administrative burden are met using current implementation strategies. We suggest an adapted strategy.}, doi = {10.1007/978-0-387-39229-5_26}, owner = {Tom van Engers}, timestamp = {2006.11.20} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Arendsen:04, author = {Rex Arendsen and Tom M. van Engers}, title = {Reduction of the Administrative Burden: An e-Government Perspective}, booktitle = {Electronic Government: Third International Conference, EGOV 2004}, year = {2004}, volume = {3183}, series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, pages = {200}, address = {Zaragoza, Spain}, month = {August 30-September 3}, publisher = {Springer-Verlag Heidelberg}, abstract = {The introduction of e-Government thus far has been largely focused on improving service delivery and governmental back office integration. Nevertheless the State of Affairs in e-Government in Europe shows a growing mismatch between supply and demand in e-Services to the public. The current focus on the reduction of the administrative burden however has opened up new perspectives in the development of e-Government. In this paper we present an overview of the political and technological issues that dominate the discussion on the reduction of administrative burden. We will furthermore explain some critical success factors in this process. As an illustration we will refer to the approach followed in the Dutch e-Government Programme.}, owner = {rinke}, url = {http://www.springerlink.com/link.asp?id=bhj6v5eju1dw8p1d} } @ARTICLE{Peters:05, author = {J. Becking and S. Course and G. van Enk and H.T. Hangyi and J.J.M. Lahaye and D. Ockeloen and R. Peters and H. Rosbergen and R. van Wendel de Joode}, title = {{MMBase}: An open-source content management-system}, journal = {IBM Systems Journal}, year = {2005}, volume = {44}, pages = {381-397}, number = {2}, owner = {Rinke Hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/peters/peters05ibm.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:00a, author = {A.~Boer}, title = {The {C}onsultancy {G}ame}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2000: The Thirteenth Annual Conference}, year = {2000}, editor = {J.A.~Breuker and R.~Leenes and R.G.F.~Winkels}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {99--112}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS Press}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j00-09.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:01b, author = {A.~Boer}, title = {{MILE}: Turning {L}egal {I}nformation into {L}egal {A}dvice}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Twelfth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA)}, year = {2001}, editor = {A.M.~Tjoa and R.R.~Wagner}, pages = {787--791}, address = {Los Alamitos (CA)}, publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}, abstract = {As part of the CLIME project we developed an Information Retrieval tool called MILE for homogenous legal regulations about technical domains. This tool is based on a legal assessment module that provides answers in a format that is explicitly based on the structure encountered of legal advice given by legal consultants. This paper describes the context of use, interface, underlying encoding, and capabilities of the MILE legal assessment module, as well as limitations of the knowledge representation for legal information.}, doi = {10.1109/DEXA.2001.953152} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:2007d, author = {Alexander Boer}, title = {Using Event Descriptions for Metadata about Legal Documents}, booktitle = {Electronic Proceedings of the Workshop on Standards for Legislative XML, in conjunction with Jurix 2007}, year = {2007}, editor = {Radboud Winkels and Enrico Francesconi}, owner = {Aboer}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/~winkels/events.pdf}, timestamp = {2008.04.18}, url = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/~winkels/LegislativeXML-Program.htm} } @TECHREPORT{Boer:2006a, author = {Alexander Boer}, title = {Notes on the Legal Knowledge Interchange Format}, institution = {Leibniz Center for Law, University of Amsterdam}, year = {2006}, type = {ESTRELLA Technical Report}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2006.10.31} } @TECHREPORT{Boer:99c, author = {A.~Boer and D.~Bosscher and R.G.F.~Winkels}, title = {Legal {R}easoning {S}oftware {S}pecification}, institution = {CLIME Consortium}, year = {1999}, type = {Esprit Project 21525 CLIME, deliverable}, number = {D 1.2} } @TECHREPORT{Boer:00b, author = {A.~Boer and D.~Bosscher and R.G.F.~Winkels and R.~Hoekstra}, title = {Evaluation of {L}egal {E}xplanation {P}rototype}, institution = {CLIME Consortium}, year = {2000}, type = {Esprit Project 21525 CLIME, deliverable}, number = {D 3.1} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:98a, author = {A.~Boer and J.A.~Breuker}, title = {So You Want to {V}alidate your {P}roblem-{S}olving {M}ethods?}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Knowledge Acquisition Workshop (KAW)}, year = {1998}, editor = { }, address = {Banff, Canada}, publisher = { } } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:99a, author = {A.~Boer and J.A.~Breuker}, title = {Verifying and {V}alidating the {CommonKADS} {L}ibrary of {P}roblem-{S}olving {M}ethods}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Second French-American Conference on Validation and Verification}, year = {1998}, editor = { }, address = {N\^{\i}mes, France}, publisher = { } } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:2005b, author = {A.~Boer and T.~van~Engers}, title = {Standards for Spatial Regulations}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop on the Role of legal knowledge in e-Government, held in conjunction with the Tenth International Conference on ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE and LAW}, year = {2005}, address = { Bologna, Italy }, abstract = {The Leibniz Center for Law is involved in the project Digitale Uitwisseling Ruimtelijke Plannen (DURP1; digital exchange of spatial plans) which develops a digital exchange format for spatial regulations. For the researchers of the Leibniz Center for Law, hav-ing designed the METALex XML schema (cf. Boer et al., 2002 and Boer et al., 2003) for ?regular? legal sources, involvement in the DURP project offers new possibilities to study a legal area that hasn't yet been studied to the extent it deserves in the field of Computer Science & Law. The last few months we made an inventory of issues we feel are not suffi-ciently covered by current initiatives in the Geo-graphic Information Systems (GIS) field. This inventory is an input to the DURP standardization effort. In this paper we will also discuss the possibility of extending the Lex XML schema in order to support exchange of spatial regulations, including the associated geospatial information in the form of maps.}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.nl/docs/boer/boer-egov-final10p.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:03b, author = {A.~Boer and T.~van~Engers}, title = {{A} {K}nowledge {E}ngineering {A}pproach to {C}omparing {L}egislation}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Conference on Knowledge Management in Government}, year = {2003}, address = {Rhodes, Greece}, publisher = {Springer Verlag}, abstract = {In the E-POWER project relevant tax legislation and business processes are modelled in UML to improve the speed and efficiency with which the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration can implement decision support systems for internal use and for its clients. These conceptual models have also proven their usefulness for efficient and effective analysis of draft legislation. We are currently researching whether conceptual modeling can also be used to compare similar legislation from different jurisdictions. Better insight in the process of modeling and comparing legislation from different legislators is expected to improve the capacity of the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration to react to future consequences of increased movement of people, products, and money between EU member states and increased harmonization between tax authorities in Europe. In addition, the discovery of the requirements of comparing models is also expected to result in a more principled, more robust, and language-independent methodology for modeling legislation. This paper discusses known problems and requirements of comparing legislation, and the expected results of comparing models of legislation.}, doi = {10.1007/3-540-44836-5_15}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/epower/publications/km-egov-aboer-final.pdf} } @ARTICLE{Boer:07b, author = {Alexander Boer and Tom van Engers and Rob Peters and Radboud Winkels}, title = {Separating law from Geography in GIS-based eGovernment services}, journal = {Artificial Intelligence \& Law}, year = {2007}, volume = {15(1)}, pages = {49-76}, month = {February}, abstract = {The Leibniz Center for Law is involved in the project Digitale Uitwisseling Ruimtelijke Plannen [DURP (http://www.vrom.nl/durp); digital exchange of spatial plans] which develops a XML-based digital exchange format for spatial regulations. Involvement in the DURP project offers new possibilities to study a legal area that hasn't yet been studied to the extent it deserves in the field of Computer Science \& Law. We studied and criticised the work of the DURP project and the Dutch Ministry of internal affairs on metadata for regulatory documents, and made an inventory of issues related to legal knowledge representation that it felt were not sufficiently covered by current initiatives in the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) field. This inventory was an input to the DURP standardisation effort. In a second phase of the project we extended the METALex XML schema (cf. Boer et al. 2002; Boer et al. 2003) for regular legal sources that we developed in the past for geospatial regulatory information, in order to support exchange of spatial regulations, including the associated geospatial information in the form of maps. We developed a prototype application and demonstrated how the spatial planning information in GML can be combined with XML with only minimal changes, using the Web Ontology Language (OWL). This paper describes our experiences.}, doi = {10.1007/s10506-007-9042-4}, keywords = {GIS, GML, law, norms, Semantic Web}, owner = {Aboer}, pdf = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/31032377rv061769/fulltext.pdf}, timestamp = {2007.02.15}, url = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/31032377rv061769/} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:2005f, author = {Alexander Boer and Tom van Engers and Radboud Winkels}, title = {Mixing Legal and Non-Legal Norms}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2005: The Eighteenth Annual Conference}, year = {2005}, editor = {M-F. Moens and P. Spyns}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {25-36}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS Press}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j05-05.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:2005a, author = {A.~Boer and T.~van~Engers and R.~Winkels}, title = {Normative Statements on the Semantic web}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop on Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques, held in conjunction with the Tenth International Conference on ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE and LAW}, year = {2005}, address = { Bologna, Italy } } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:2005c, author = {A.~Boer and T.~van~Engers and R.~Winkels}, title = {Open Standards for Spatial Regulations: an Interdisciplinary Approach}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Holland Open Software Conference}, year = {2005}, address = {Amsterdam, Netherlands}, abstract = {The Leibniz Center for Law is involved in the project Digitale Uitwisseling Ruimtelijke Plannen (DURP1; digital exchange of spatial plans) which develops a digital exchange format for spatial regulations. For the researchers of the Leibniz Center for Law, having designed the METALex XML schema for 'regular' legal sources, involvement in the DURP project offers new possibilities to study a legal area that hasn't yet been studied to the extent it deserves in the field of Computer Science & Law. The last few months we made an inventory of issues we feel are not sufficiently covered by current intiatives in the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) field. This inventory is an input to the DURP standardization effort. In this paper we will also discuss the possibility of extending the METALex XML schema in order to support exchange of spatial regulations, including the associated geospatial information in the form of maps.}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.nl/docs/boer/boer-hosc.pdf} } @TECHREPORT{Boer:2005d, author = {Alexander Boer and Tom van Engers and Radboud Winkels}, title = {Probleemverkenning implementatie afspraken en standaarden {DURP}}, institution = {Leibniz Center for Law}, year = {2005}, type = {Rapport voor ministerie {VROM}}, month = {April} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:03c, author = {Alexander~Boer and Tom~van~Engers and Radboud~Winkels}, title = {{U}sing {O}ntologies for {C}omparing and {H}armonizing {L}egislation}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL)}, year = {2003}, address = {Edinburgh (UK)}, publisher = {ACM Press}, abstract = {In the last decades the interest in the problem of comparing and harmonizing legislation has been steadily increasing. One reason is the increasing legal convergence between governments in the European Union, and the increasing traffic of people over borders of jurisdictions. Another reason is the increasing globalization of companies; Products and services are offered in many jurisdictions at the same time, and the product or service has to meet the provisions of all jurisdictions in which it is offered. In the E-POWER project relevant tax legislation and business processes are modeled in UML to improve the speed and efficiency with which the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration can implement decision support systems for internal use and for its clients. These conceptual models have also proven their usefulness for efficient and effective analysis of draft legislation. We are currently researching whether conceptual modeling can also be used to compare similar legislation from different jurisdictions to improve the capacity of the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration to react to future consequences of increased movement of people, products, and money between EU member states and increased harmonization between tax authorities in Europe. In addition, addressing the problem of comparing models is also expected to improve our methodology for modeling legislation. This paper discusses problems and requirements of comparing legislation as we understand them now, and attempts to relate them to relevant research.}, doi = {10.1145/1047788.1047798}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/epower/publications/boer.pdf} } @TECHREPORT{estrella1.1:07, author = {Alexander Boer and Thomas F. Gordon and Kasper {van den Berg} and Marcello {Di Bello} and Andr\'as F\"orh\'ecz and R\'eka Vas}, title = {Specification of the Legal Knowledge Interchange Format}, institution = {Estrella}, year = {2007}, type = {Deliverable 1.1}, date-added = {2006-12-19 00:26:31 +0100}, date-modified = {2007-01-16 16:40:46 +0100}, owner = {hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.estrellaproject.org/doc/D1.1-LKIF-Specification.pdf}, timestamp = {2007.02.13} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:03e, author = {A.~Boer and R.~Hoekstra and R.~Winkels and T.~van~Engers}, title = {$^{META}Lex$: {J}urisdiction and {L}anguage}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the E-Government Workshop in conjunction with JURIX 2003}, year = {2003}, editor = {Monica Palmirani and Tom van Engers and Maria A. Wimmer}, pages = {54-66}, month = {December}, publisher = {Universit\"{a}tsverlag Rudolf Trauner}, abstract = {$^{META}Lex$ provides a generic and easily extensible framework for the XML encoding of the structure and contents of legal documents. This paper discusses some design decisions related to language and jurisdiction neutrality} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:02a, author = {A.~Boer and R.~Hoekstra and R.~Winkels and T.~van~Engers and F.~Willaert}, title = {$^{META}Lex$: {L}egislation in {XML}}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2002: The Fifteenth Annual Conference}, year = {2002}, editor = {T.~Bench-Capon and Aspassia~Daskalopulu and R.G.F.~Winkels}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {1--10}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS Press}, abstract = {This paper presents a proposal for an open XML standard for the markup of legal documents: METALex. The standard provides a generic and easily extensible framework for the XML encoding of the structure and contents of legal and paralegal documents. It differs from other existing metadata schemes in two respects: It is language and jurisdiction independent and it aims to accommodate uses of XML beyond search and presentation services.}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j02-01.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:02b, author = {A.~Boer and R.~Hoekstra and R.~Winkels and T.~van Engers and F.~Willaert}, title = {{P}roposal for a {D}utch {L}egal {XML} {Standard}}, booktitle = {Electronic Government (EGOV 2002)}, year = {2002}, editor = {R.~Traunm\"uller and K.~Lenk}, pages = {142--149}, address = {Berlin; Heidelberg; New York}, publisher = {Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, abstract = {This paper presents a proposal for an XML Standard for legal sources in the Netherlands. The standard intends to provide a generic and easily extensible framework for the XML encoding of the structure and contents of legal and paralegal documents. It differs from other existing metadata schemes for legal documents in two respects; It is language independent and it aims to accommodate uses of XML beyond search and presentation services.}, pdf = {http://www.metalex.nl/pages/reports/egov2002.pdf} } @TECHREPORT{Boer:2004xb, author = {Alexander Boer and Emile de Maat and Matthijs Breebaart and Henri Melger and Radboud Winkels and Tom van Engers }, title = { Haalbaarheidsonderzoek Kennisbank }, institution = { Leibniz Center for Law }, year = {2004}, type = { rapport voor de Belastingdienst }, month = { November } } @ARTICLE{Boer:2005e, author = {Alexander Boer and Radboud Winkels}, title = {{W}hat's in an {I}nterchange {S}tandard for {L}egislative {XML}?}, journal = {I Quaderni}, year = {2005}, volume = {{N}ovembre}, pages = {32--41}, number = {18}, abstract = {To make efficient and effective use of all legal sources electronically available in Europe, with all their different ({XML}) formats, we need an open interchange standard. Such a standard will enable public administrations to better serve their citizens and organisations, to link legal information from various levels of authority and different countries and languages. Moreover, it will enable companies active in the field of legal knowledge systems to design methods and tools that support a much larger market and it will protect customers of such companies from vendor lock-in. Such an interchange standard should obviously be jurisdiction and language independent. Furthermore, it should refrain from describing elements that are not specific for legal documents and it should refrain from describing elements that require interpretation of the content of these documents. Finally, the standard should allow for easy (external) linking of separate knowledge models of the content to the original legal sources.} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:04a, author = {Alexander Boer and Radboud Winkels and Tom van Engers and Emile de Maat}, title = {A Content Management System based on an Event-based Model of Version Management Information in Legislation}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference.}, year = {2004}, editor = {T. Gordon}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {19--28}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS Press}, abstract = {Understanding electronic legislation requires a comprehension of its lifecycle and the events and corresponding transformations that make up this lifecycle. A metadata description attached to the legislative resource represents a time point in this lifecycle. In this paper we advocate an event-based model of version management for legislation. We are currently developing a Content Management System (CMS) based on this model. This paper discusses the event-based model, sketches the infrastructure of the CMS, and relates it to timestamping in METALex documents.}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/boer/boer-jurix2004.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:2004xa, author = {Alexander Boer and Radboud Winkels and Tom van Engers and Emile de Maat}, title = {Time and Versions in $^{META}Lex$ {XML}}, booktitle = {Proceeding of the Workshop on Legislative {XML}}, year = {2004}, address = { Kobaek Strand }, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/boer/kopenhagen2004.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:01c, author = {A.~Boer and R.G.F.~Winkels and R.~Hoekstra}, title = {The {CLIME} {O}ntology}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the {S}econd {I}nternational {W}orkshop on {L}egal {O}ntologies ({LEGONT})}, year = {2001}, editor = {R.G.F.~Winkels}, pages = {37--47}, address = {Amsterdam, Netherlands}, publisher = { } } @ARTICLE{Boer:03a, author = {A.~Boer and R.~Winkels and R.~Hoekstra}, title = {$^{META}Lex$: een schema voor de struktuur van wet- en regelgeving}, journal = {$<$!ELEMENT}, year = {2003}, volume = {1}, url = {http://www.sgml-ug.nl/HTML/frame_artikel/frame_element/artikelen/standaard/metalex.htm} } @TECHREPORT{Boer:00c, author = {A.~Boer and R.G.F.~Winkels and R.~Hoekstra}, title = {Evaluation of {L}egal {E}ncoding}, institution = {CLIME Consortium}, year = {2000}, type = {Esprit Project 21525 CLIME, deliverable}, number = {D 3.2} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:03f, author = {Alexander Boer and Radboud Winkels and Rinke Hoekstra and Tom M. van Engers}, title = {{K}nowledge {M}anagement for {L}egislative {D}rafting in an {I}nternational {S}etting}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2003: The Sixteenth Annual Conference.}, year = {2003}, editor = {D. Bourcier}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {91-100}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS Press}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j03-10.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Boer:07c, author = {Alexander Boer and Radboud Winkels and Fabio Vitali}, title = {Proposed {XML} Standards for Law: MetaLex and {LKIF}}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference Annual Conference}, year = {2007}, editor = {Arno R. Lodder and Laurens Mommers}, volume = {165}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {19-28}, month = {December}, publisher = {IOS Press}, owner = {Aboer}, timestamp = {2007.10.16} } @INCOLLECTION{Boer:2008a, author = {Alexander Boer and Radboud Winkels and Fabio Vitali}, title = {MetaLex {XML} and the {L}egal {K}nowledge {I}nterchange {F}ormat}, booktitle = {Computational Models of the Law}, publisher = {Springer}, year = {2008}, editor = {Giovanni Sartor and Pompeu Casanovas and N{'u}ria Casellas and Rossella Rubino}, volume = {LNCS 4884}, series = {Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence}, owner = {Aboer}, timestamp = {2008.04.18} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Bredeweg:93a, author = {B. Bredeweg and J. Breuker}, title = {``{D}evice {M}odels'' for model-based diagnosis of student behaviour}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the {W}orld {C}onference on {AI} and {E}ducation}, year = {1993}, editor = {S. Ohlsson}, address = {Charlottesville, VA}, publisher = {AACE} } @TECHREPORT{Bredeweg:92a, author = {B. Bredeweg and J.A. Breuker and A. Valente}, title = {The {CommonKADS} {L}ibrary: the structure}, institution = {University of Amsterdam}, year = {1992}, type = {Esprit-Report}, number = {KADS-II/T1.3/WP/UvA} } @INCOLLECTION{Bredeweg:94a, author = {B.~Bredeweg and R.G.F.~Winkels}, title = {Student Modelling Through Qualitative Reasoning}, booktitle = {Student Modelling: The Key to Individualized Knowledge--Based Instruction}, publisher = {Springer Verlag}, year = {1994}, editor = {J.\ Greer}, pages = {63--98}, address = {Berlin}, note = {NATO ASI--Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences, Vol.~125} } @ARTICLE{Bredeweg:98a, author = {B.~Bredeweg and R.G.F.~Winkels}, title = {Qualitative Models in Interactive Learning Environments: An Introduction}, journal = {Interactive Learning Environments}, year = {1997}, volume = {5}, pages = {1--18}, number = {1}, note = {Special Issue, 1995, printed 1998}, address = {Norwood, NJ}, publisher = {Ablex} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:94a, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {A {KADS C}onceptual {M}odel and {A}rchitecture for {A}rtificial {L}egal {R}easoning}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Conference -Towards a Global Expert System in Law-}, year = {1994}, editor = {G. Bargellini and S. Binazzi}, organization = {Instituto per la Documentazione Giuridica del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche}, optnote = {Florence, 1-3 December 1993, to appear in 1994} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:91c, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {Learning construction problem solving}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the {I}nternational Conference on the {L}earning {S}ciences}, year = {1991}, editor = {L. Birnbaum}, pages = {59--67}, address = {Charlottesville, VA}, publisher = {AACE} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:93b, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {Modelling {A}rtificial {L}egal {R}easoning}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the {E}uropean workshop on {K}nowledge {A}cquisition}, year = {1993}, editor = {G. Boy and N. Aussenac and B. Gaines and J. Boose}, pages = {34 -- 45}, address = {Berlin}, publisher = {Springer Verlag} } @INCOLLECTION{Breuker:90d, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {Conceptual {M}odel of {I}ntelligent {H}elp {S}ystems}, booktitle = {{EUROHELP}: developing {I}ntelligent {H}elp {S}ystems}, publisher = {EC}, year = {1990}, editor = {J.A. Breuker}, chapter = {2}, pages = {41 -- 66}, address = {Copenhagen, DM} } @INCOLLECTION{Breuker:94b, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {A Suite of problem types}, booktitle = {{CommonKADS Library} for {E}xpertise {M}odelling}, publisher = {IOS-Press/Ohmsha}, year = {1994}, editor = {J.A. Breuker and W. Van de Velde}, pages = {57 -- 88}, address = {Amsterdam/Tokyo} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:03c, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {Managing legal domains: in search of a core ontology for law}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop on Knowledge Management and the Semantic Web at KCAP-2003}, year = {2003}, editor = {R. Dieng and F. Gadon}, pdf = {ftp://ftp-sop.inria.fr/acacia/proceedings/2003/kcap-kmsw/kcap2003-kmsw-Breuker.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:94d, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {Problem Types and a Library of Problem Solving Components}, booktitle = {Proceedings of {FLAIRS-94}, {F}lorida {AI} Conference}, year = {1994}, editor = {K. Ford and D. Dankel}, pages = {65 -- 74}, publisher = {AACE} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:04d, author = {Joost Breuker}, title = {Constructing a legal core ontology: {LRI-Core}}, booktitle = {Proceedings WONTO-2004, Workshop on ontologies and their applications}, year = {2004}, editor = {Fred Freitas and Heiner Stuckenschmidt and Raphael Volz}, pages = {115-126}, publisher = {LivroRapido, Porto Alegre, {BR}}, pdf = {http://www.ws.onto.ufal.br/Papers/brazil-2004-ontology-ws.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:03a, author = {Joost Breuker}, title = {The construction and use of ontologies of criminal law in the {eCourt} European project}, booktitle = {Proceedings of Means of electronic communication in court administration}, year = {2003}, editor = {V. Golaczynski}, pages = {15-40}, publisher = {ILV, Wroclaw} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:92d, author = {J.A.P.J. Breuker}, title = {On Legal Information Serving}, booktitle = {Legal knowledge based systems JURIX 92: Information Technology and Law , The Foundation for Legal Knowledge Systems}, year = {1992}, editor = {C.A.F.M. Gr\"utters and J.A.P.J. Breuker and H.J. Van den Herik and A.H.J. Schmidt and C.N.J. De Vey Mestdagh}, pages = {93-102}, address = {Lelystad}, publisher = {Koninklijke Vermande}, note = {ISBN 90 5458 031 3}, owner = {Rinke Hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j92-13.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:92c, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {On {L}egal {I}nformation {S}erving}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge Based Systems: information technology and law}, year = {1992}, editor = {C.A. Grutters and J.A. Breuker and H.J. van den Herik and A.H.J. Schmidt and C.N.J. de Vey Mestdagh}, pages = {93 -- 102}, publisher = {Koninklijke Vermande} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:84a, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {A Theoretical Framework for Spatial Learning Strategies}, booktitle = {Spatial Learning Strategies}, year = {1984}, editor = {C.D. Holley and D. Dansereau}, pages = {31 --- 46}, address = {New York N.Y.}, publisher = {Academic Press} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:92a, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {Generality Watching: {ITS} caught between research and engineering}, booktitle = {Proceedings of ITS--92, Montreal}, year = {1992}, editor = {G. McCalla and C. Frasson}, pages = {35--46}, address = {Charlottesville, VA}, publisher = {AACE} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:90b, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {Towards a {W}orkbench for the {L}egal {P}ractitioner}, booktitle = {{L}egal {K}nowledge {B}ased {S}ystems: {A}ims for {R}esearch and {D}evelopment, JURIX--1990}, year = {1990}, editor = {C. van Noortwijk and A.H.J. Schmidt and R.G.F. Winkels}, pages = {25 -- 36}, address = {Lelystad}, publisher = {Koninklijke Vermande BV} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:93f, author = {Joost Breuker}, title = {Reusable {C}omponents for {A}rtificial {P}roblem {S}olvers: the {C}ommon {KADS} library experience}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the {IJCAI}-93 {W}orkshop on {K}nowledge {S}haring and {I}nformation {E}xchange}, year = {1993}, editor = {C. Peyralbe}, address = {Paris}, publisher = {CAP}, note = {14 p.} } @INCOLLECTION{Breuker:88a, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {Coaching in Help Systems}, booktitle = {Artificial Intelligence and Human Learning. Intelligent Computer-Aided Instruction}, publisher = {Chapman and Hall}, year = {1988}, editor = {J. Self}, address = {London} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:94e, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {Components of Problem Solving}, booktitle = {A Future for Knowledge Acquisition: proceedings of the {EKAW-94}, {European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop}}, year = {1994}, editor = {L. Steels and A.Th. Schreiber and W. van de Velde}, pages = {118 -- 136}, address = {Berlin}, publisher = {Springer Verlag} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:01a, author = {J. Breuker}, title = {The use of core ontologies in managing legal knowledge and information}, booktitle = {Legal Solutions Europe 2001}, year = {2001}, pages = {1--20}, address = {London}, publisher = {Ark Group} } @TECHREPORT{KDE-8.1:01, author = {J. Breuker}, title = {Success criteria and evaluation plan}, institution = {University of Amsterdam}, year = {2001}, number = {KDE, Deliverable 8.1.}, address = {Amsterdam, the Netherlands}, pages = {28} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:95a, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {Problem types and the {CommonKADS Library}}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the NAIC-95}, year = {1995}, pages = {149 --- 158}, editors = {J.C. Bioch and Y-H. Tan} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:95b, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {Problems, tasks, and problem solving methods: constructing the {CommonKADS Library}}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the KBUP: knowledge based systems for the (re)use of program libraries}, year = {1995}, pages = {41 -- 54}, publisher = {INRIA, Sophia Antipolis (F)} } @TECHREPORT{Breuker:91e, author = {J. Breuker}, title = {Towards {CML} {S}tandards for Specifying Generic Models}, institution = {University of Amsterdam}, year = {1991}, type = {ESPRIT Project P5248}, number = {KADS-II/T1.3/WP/UvA/010/0.1} } @ARTICLE{Breuker:91g, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {{A}rtificial {I}ntelligence and {C}ommon {S}ense in {L}aw}, journal = {{I}naugural {S}peech}, year = {1991}, institute = {{D}epartment of {C}omputer {S}cience and {L}aw, {F}aculty of {L}aw, {U}niversity of {A}msterdam} } @PHDTHESIS{Breuker:81a, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {Availability of Knowledge}, school = {COWO University of Amsterdam}, year = {1981}, number = {JB-01-81} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:81b, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {Intelligent and rather intelligent {CAI}}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the ADCIS-81}, year = {1981}, address = {Atlanta, GA}, organization = {ADCIS} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:81e, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {{DART:} an author system for intelligent {CAI}}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the ADCIS}, year = {1981}, pages = {45 -- 71}, address = {Atlanta, GA}, publisher = {ADCIS} } @ARTICLE{Breuker:81f, author = {J.A. Breuker}, title = {Cognitive puzzling and question answering}, journal = {Computers and the Humanities}, year = {1981}, volume = {14}, pages = {56 -- 62} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:89a, author = {J. A. Breuker and B. J. Wielinga}, title = {Model Driven Knowledge Acquisition}, booktitle = {Topics in the Design of Expert Systems}, year = {1989}, editor = {P. Guida and G. Tasso}, pages = {265-296}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {North Holland} } @TECHREPORT{Breuker:87c, author = {J.A. Breuker and others}, title = {Model-Driven Knowledge Acquisition: Interpretation Models}, institution = {University of Amsterdam}, year = {1987}, type = {Esprit Project P1098} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:02ba, author = {J.A. Breuker and A. Boer}, title = {Developing ontologies for legal information serving and management}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the {EKAW-2002} workshop on Knowledge Management through Corporate Semantic Webs}, year = {2002}, editor = {R. Dieng}, pages = {1 -- 17}, publisher = {Ekaw} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:06a, author = {Joost Breuker and Alexander Boer and Rinke Hoekstra and Kasper van den Berg}, title = {Developing Content for {LKIF}: Ontologies and Frameworks for Legal Reasoning}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference}, year = {2006}, editor = {Tom M. van Engers}, volume = {152}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {169-174}, month = {December}, publisher = {IOS Press}, owner = {Rinke Hoekstra} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:93c, author = {J.A. Breuker and B. Bredeweg and A. Valente and W. van de Velde}, title = {Reusable {P}roblem {S}olving {C}omponents: the {C}ommon{KADS} library}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the third {KADS} {M}eeting}, year = {1993}, editor = {Ch. L{\"o}ckenhoff and D. Fensel and R. Studer}, pages = {251 -- 270}, address = {Munich}, publisher = {Siemens ZFE} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:82a, author = {J.A. Breuker and S.A. Cerri}, title = {A new generation of teaching machines: intelligent and rather intelligent {CAI}}, booktitle = {Education and the New Media}, year = {1982}, editor = {E.J. van Hees and A. Dirkzwager}, pages = {23 -- 40}, address = {Lisse (NL)}, publisher = {Swets and Zeitlinger} } @ARTICLE{Breuker:81d, author = {J.A. Breuker and S. Cerri}, title = {A rather intelligent lexical language teacher}, journal = {Studies in Language Learning}, year = {1981}, volume = {3}, pages = {182 -- 192}, number = {1} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:89c, author = {J.A. Breuker and C. Duursma and R.G.F. Winkels and M. Smith}, title = {Knowledge Representation in EUROHELP: modelling operation and understanding of computer applications for Help Systems}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 6th Annual ESPRIT Conference}, year = {1989}, pages = {258 -- 270}, address = {Dordrecht}, publisher = {Kluwer} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:02b, author = {Joost Breuker and Abdullatif Elhag and Emil Petkov and Radboud Winkels}, title = {Ontologies of Legal Information Serving and Knowledge Management}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2002: The Fifteenth Annual Conference}, year = {2002}, editor = {T.J.M. Bench-Capon and A. Daskalopulu and R.G.F. Winkels}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {73-82}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS Press}, owner = {Rinke Hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j02-08.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:02d, author = {Joost Breuker and Abdullatif Elhag and Emil Petkov and Radboud Winkels}, title = {IT support for the judiciary: Use of ontologies in the {eCourt} project}, booktitle = {Prceedings of the ICCS Conference on Conceptual Graphs}, year = {2002}, pages = {17 -- 26} } @INCOLLECTION{Breuker:93a, author = {J.A. Breuker and P. de Greef}, title = {Modelling System-User Cooperation}, booktitle = {{KADS}: a {P}rincipled {A}pproach to {K}nowledge {E}ngineering}, publisher = {Academic Press}, year = {1993}, editor = {A.Th. Schreiber and B.J. Wielinga and J.A. Breuker}, pages = {47 -- 70}, address = {London} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:89b, author = {J.A. Breuker and P. de Greef}, title = {{MODALITEIT}, Analyse van systeem-gebruiker cooperatie}, booktitle = {Proceedings van de Nederlandstalige AI Conferentie}, year = {1989}, editor = {L. Siklossy and R. R. Bakker}, pages = {169 - 178}, publisher = {Academic Service} } @TECHREPORT{Breuker:85b, author = {Breuker, J.A. and de~Greef, P.H.}, title = {Functional Specification: Teaching and Coaching Strategies for Eurohelp}, institution = {University of Amsterdam}, year = {1985}, number = {UAM/002}, note = {Deliverable 4.3} } @ARTICLE{Breuker:85c, author = {Breuker, J.A. and de~Greef, P.H.}, title = {Information Processing Systems and Teaching and Coaching in Help Systems}, journal = {AI Applications}, year = {1985}, volume = {2}, pages = {23 -- 64}, number = {UAM/003} } @TECHREPORT{Breuker:85d, author = {Breuker, J. and de~Greef, P.}, title = {Teaching and Coaching Strategies for Eurohelp}, institution = {University of Amsterdam}, year = {1985}, number = {UAM/001} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:91b, author = {Joost Breuker and Nienke den Haan}, title = {Separating world and regulation knowledge: where is the logic?}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the third international conference on {AI} and {L}aw}, year = {1991}, editor = {M. Sergot}, pages = {41--51}, address = {New York, NJ}, publisher = {ACM}, doi = {10.1145/112646.112658} } @ARTICLE{Breuker:93e, author = {J.A. Breuker and N. den Haan}, title = {Artifici{\"e}le intelligentie bij het ontwerpen van regelingen}, journal = {Computerrecht}, year = {1993}, pages = {187--189}, number = {5}, institute = {Vakgroep Rechtsinformatica, Universiteit van Amsterdam} } @INCOLLECTION{Breuker:90e, author = {J.A. Breuker and N. de Haan and C. Duursma and R. Winkels}, title = {Knowledge {R}epresentation}, booktitle = {{EUROHELP}: developing {I}ntelligent {H}elp {S}ystems}, publisher = {EC}, year = {1990}, editor = {J.A. Breuker}, chapter = {2}, pages = {209 -- 234}, address = {Copenhagen, DM} } @TECHREPORT{Breuker:91f, author = {J.A. Breuker and N. den Haan and A. Muntjewerff}, title = {Empirical studies on the international sales of goods and the role of contracting}, institution = {University of Amsterdam}, year = {1991}, type = {Technical Report, Deliverable D1 ALDUS Esprit project (P 5296)}, address = {Fac. der Rechtsgeleerheid (Dep. of Law)}, note = {also part of {Final Report ALDUS project, ALDUS Consortium}, november 1991} } @ARTICLE{Breuker:98a, author = {J.A.~Breuker and N.~den~Haan and R.G.F.~Winkels}, title = {Kan wetsontwerpen wel zonder rekentuig?}, journal = {Rechtshulp}, year = {1998}, pages = {7--14}, number = {6/7}, note = {In Dutch}, address = {Alphen aan den Rijn}, publisher = {Samson/H.D. Tjeenk Willink} } @INCOLLECTION{Breuker:88b, author = {J.A. Breuker and G.J. Hekkert and O.W.M. Kamstra and A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Pardigma van het {Laboratorium voor Rechtsinformatica}}, booktitle = {Rechts Informatica Paradigmata}, publisher = {Koninklijke Vermande}, year = {1988}, editor = {P. van den Berg and A.F.M. {Gr\"uters} and O.W.M. Kamstra and T. van Willigenburg}, pages = {55 -- 63}, address = {Lelystad} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:04e, author = {Joost Breuker and Rinke Hoekstra}, title = {DIRECT: Ontology based Discovery of Responsibility and Causality in Legal Case Descriptions}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference.}, year = {2004}, editor = {T. Gordon}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {59-68}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS Press}, abstract = {In this paper we present DIRECT, a system for automatic discovery of responsibility and causal relations in legal case descriptions based on LRI-Core, a core ontology that covers the main concepts that are common to all legal domains. These domains have a predominant common-sense character ? the law is still for the people ? and typical legal concepts such as norm, role responsibility, contract, etc. have a grounding in abstract common-sense conceptualizations. A common sense framework is even more necessary for the automatic discovery of the causal structure of legal case descriptions, since they often are even devoid of a specialized legal conceptualization. The paper presents a number of design principles that follow from the common-sense stance in developing the LRI-Core: the most important being cognitive plausibility. Furthermore, an approach is presented to enable the automatic analysis of cases described in terms of the ontology. Such analysis will determine causal chains in situation descriptions on the basis of which responsibility attribution can take place.}, owner = {rinke} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:04b, author = {Joost Breuker and Rinke Hoekstra}, title = {Core concepts of law: taking common-sense seriously}, booktitle = {Proceedings of Formal Ontologies in Information Systems {FOIS-2004}}, year = {2004}, pages = {210-221}, publisher = {IOS-Press}, abstract = {In this paper we present LRI-Core, a core ontology for covering domains of law. After a decade of developing many ontologies for legal domains and applications, the need for a unifying core ontology that covers the main concepts that are common to all legal domains became very apparent. It can be argued that not only these domains have a predominant common-sense character ? the law is still for the people ? but also that typical legal concepts such as norm, role responsibility, contract, etc. have still a grounding in abstract common-sense conceptualizations. This common sense grounding is lacking in various upper- or foundational ontologies developed thus far. The paper presents a number of design principles that follow from the common-sense stance in developing the LRI-Core: the most important being cognitive plausibility. From this perspective, knowledge about the physical world, with the central notions of object and process is taken as a basis for metaphorizing mental and abstract worlds. The intentional stance that differentiates the physical world from the mental world is also the basis for the creation of a behavioural world of roles. In summary, LRI-Core starts with four main categories: physical classes, mental classes, roles, and abstract classes. A fifth category consists of terms for occurrences, which are used to talk about instances (situations) in a generic way.}, owner = {rinke}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/breuker/fois-2004-paper.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:04c, author = {Joost Breuker and Rinke Hoekstra}, title = {Epistemology and ontology in core ontologies: {FOLaw} and {LRI-Core}, two core ontologies for law}, booktitle = {Proceedings of {EKAW} Workshop on {Core} ontologies }, year = {2004}, publisher = {{CEUR}}, abstract = {For more than a decade constructing ontologies for legal domains, we, at the Leibniz Center for Law, felt really the need to develop a core ontology for law that would enable us to re-use the common denominator of the various legal domains. In this paper we present two core ontologies for law. The first one was the result of a PhD thesis by [Valente, 1995], called FOLaw. FOLaw speci- fies functional dependencies between types of knowledge involved in legal reasoning. Despite the fact that FOLaw was the starting point for a number of ontologies and legal reasoning systems in various (European) projects, it is rather an epistemological framework than a (core) ontology. We are not the only ones who easily confound epistemology with ontology. In the paper we present some examples and discuss whether this epistemological promiscuity in (core) ontology development is a serious problem. It is to some extent, as it limits the scope of re-use (if not leading to confusion). Therefore, we started about four years ago the development of a 'real' core-ontology for law based upon notions of common sense. The reason for a common-sense foundation is that domain independent concepts of law - the common denominator - are still tainted with a strong common-sense flavor. Moreover, domains of law refer to social activities which are generally governed by common-sense notions. This core ontology, called LRI-Core, consists of five major portions ('worlds'): physical, mental and abstract classes; roles and occurrences.}, pdf = {http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-118/paper2.pdf}, url = {http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/} } @TECHREPORT{estrella1.4:07, author = {Joost Breuker and Rinke Hoekstra and Alexander Boer and Kasper {van den Berg} and Rossella Rubino and Giovanni Sartor and Monica Palmirani and Adam Wyner and Trevor {Bench-Capon}}, title = {{OWL} Ontology of Basic Legal Concepts ({LKIF-Core})}, institution = {Estrella}, year = {2007}, type = {Deliverable 1.4}, date-added = {2006-12-19 00:26:31 +0100}, date-modified = {2007-01-16 16:40:46 +0100}, owner = {hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.estrellaproject.org/doc/D1.4-OWL-Ontology-of-Basic-Legal-Concepts.pdf}, timestamp = {2007.02.13}, url = {http://www.estrellaproject.org/lkif-core} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:00b, author = {J.A. Breuker and W. Jansweijer and E. van der Stadt and J. van Lieshout}, title = {Manageable and meaningful information brokering}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the EKAW-2000 workshop on Knowledge Management}, year = {2000}, pages = {15-25}, owner = {rinke} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:83a, author = {J.A. Breuker and E. van der Linden}, title = {Het oplossen van {F}ranse grammatica problemen}, booktitle = {Onderwijsleerprocessen}, year = {1983}, editor = {J.J. Beishuizen and C. Hamaker}, pages = {113 -- 122}, address = {Lisse (NL)}, publisher = {Swets and Zeitlinger} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:83b, author = {J.A. Breuker and E. van der Linden}, title = {Solving French Grammar Problems}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the first International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education}, year = {1983}, editor = {M. Yazdani}, pages = {87 -- 90}, address = {Exeter}, publisher = {AISB} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:99, author = {J. Breuker and A.J. Muntjewerff and B. Bredeweg}, title = {Ontological Modelling for Designing Educational Systems}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontologies for Intelligent Educational Systems at AIED99}, year = {1999}, address = {LeMans} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:00, author = {Joost Breuker and Emil Petkov and Radboud Winkels}, title = {Drafting and Validating Regulations: The Inevitable Use of Intelligent Tools}, booktitle = {Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications, 9th International Conference, {AIMSA} 2000, Proceedings}, year = {2000}, editor = {Stefano A. Cerri and Danail Dochev}, pages = {21--33}, publisher = {Springer}, abstract = {In this paper we describe first the nature of laws and regulations, which are not-normal, fragmented pieces of text, that can only be understood by using some (implicit) model about the world to be regulated. Then we describe the process of drafting regulations, in par- ticular the need to verify and validate their intended effects, i.e. deontic statements. We present an ontology, FOLaw, [13] and a prototype sys- tem, TRACS (Traffic Regulation Automation and Comparison System), which was created to test new traffic regulations [2]. Even a few runs of tests showed major deficiencies in this regulation. An extended version of TRACS also enables the generation of paraphrases of regulation, and even to some extent, from scratch. The implication of the use of these kind of tools are discussed; not only for checking consistency, but also for aligning (harmonizing) regulations of different legal systems (nations).}, doi = {10.1007/3-540-45331-8_3} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:87f, author = {J.A. Breuker and J.A.C. Sandberg and R.G.F. Winkels}, title = {Coaching in EUROHELP}, booktitle = {Proceedings ESPRIT Technical Week}, year = {1987}, pages = {270 --- 278}, address = {Amsterdam}, organization = {EC, Brussels}, publisher = {North Holland} } @INCOLLECTION{Breuker:04a, author = {Joost Breuker and Andre Valente and Radboud Winkels}, title = {Use and reuse of legal ontologies in knowledge engineering and information management}, booktitle = {Law and the Semantic Web}, publisher = {Springer}, year = {2004}, editor = {V.R. Benjamins and P. Casanovas and J. Breuker and A.Gangemi}, pages = {36 -- 64} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:97a, author = {J.A. Breuker and A. Valente and R.G.F.~Winkels}, title = {Legal Ontologies: A Functional View}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Legal Ontologies}, year = {1997}, editor = {P.~Visser and R.G.F.~Winkels}, pages = {23--36}, address = {Melbourne, Australia}, publisher = {University of Melbourne} } @INCOLLECTION{Breuker:04f, author = {Joost Breuker and Andr\'e Valente and Radbound Winkels}, title = {Ontologias juridicas: una aproximacion funciona}, booktitle = {Web sem\'entica y ontolog\'ias jur\'idicas. Aplicaciones para el derecho en la nueva generaci\'on de la red.}, publisher = {Comares}, year = {2004} } @INCOLLECTION{Breuker:94c, author = {J.A. Breuker and W. Van de Velde}, title = {Introduction and overview}, booktitle = {{CommonKADS Library} for {E}xpertise {M}odelling}, publisher = {IOS-Press/Ohmsha}, year = {1994}, editor = {J.A. Breuker and W. Van de Velde}, pages = {1 -- 8}, address = {Amsterdam/Tokyo} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:87d, author = {J.A. Breuker and B.J. Wielinga}, title = { Knowledge Acquisition as modelling of expertise: the {KADS}-methodology}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the {E}uropean {K}nowledge {A}cquisition {W}orkshop}, year = {1987}, editor = {T. Addis and J. Boose and B. Gaines}, pages = {102 -- 110}, address = {Reading GB}, publisher = {Reading Press} } @INCOLLECTION{Breuker:87b, author = {J.A. Breuker and B.J. Wielinga}, title = {Use of models in the interpretation of verbal data}, booktitle = {Knowledge acquisition for Expert Systems; a practical handbook}, publisher = {Plenum Press}, year = {1987}, editor = {A. Kidd}, pages = {12 -- 30}, address = {New York} } @INCOLLECTION{Breuker:89e, author = {J.A. Breuker and B. Wielinga}, title = {Models of Expertise in Knowledge Acquisition}, booktitle = {Topics in Expert System Design: Methodologies and Tools}, publisher = {North Holland}, year = {1989} } @TECHREPORT{Breuker:84b, author = {J. Breuker and B. Wielinga}, title = {Techniques for Knowledge Elicitation and Analysis}, institution = {University of Amsterdam}, year = {1984}, type = {ESPRIT Project P12}, number = {Report 1.5} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:03b, author = {J.A. Breuker and R.G.F. Winkels}, title = {Use and Reuse of Ontologies in Legal Knowledge Engineering and Information Management}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the International Workshop on Legal Ontologies \& Web based legal information management (LegOnt'03)}, year = {2003}, editor = {Joost Breuker and Aldo Gangemi and Daniela Tiscornia and Radboud Winkels}, note = {In conjunction with ICAIL 2003}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2008.06.23} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:96a, author = {J.A.~Breuker and R.G.F.~Winkels}, title = {Between Help and Engineering: Constraints on User Task Automation}, booktitle = {Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on ``Acquisition, Learning and Demonstration: Automating Tasks for Users}, year = {1996}, editor = {Y.~Gil and B.~Swartout}, pages = {85--104}, address = {Palo Alto, CA}, publisher = {AAAI} } @INCOLLECTION{Breuker:91a, author = {J.A.\ Breuker and R.G.F.\ Winkels}, title = {The use of the {KADS} methodology in designing an {I}ntelligent {T}eaching {S}ystem for diagnosis in physiotherapy}, booktitle = {Knowledge Based Systems in Medicine: Methods, Applications and Evaluation}, publisher = {Springer-Verlag}, year = {1991}, editor = {J.L.\ Talmon and J.L.\ Fox}, pages = {3--26}, address = {Berlin} } @ARTICLE{Breuker:02ab, author = {J.A. Breuker and R. Winkels}, title = {Taking ontological commitments seriously}, journal = {Extraction Des Connaissances Et Apprentisage}, year = {2002}, volume = {1}, pages = {9-26}, number = {4}, publisher = {Hermes} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:89d, author = {J.A. Breuker and R.G.F. Winkels}, title = {{The Use of the KADS Methodology in Designing an Intelligent Teaching System for Diagnosis in Physiotherapy.}}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop System Engineering in Medicine}, year = {1989} } @ARTICLE{Breuker:90a, author = {J.A.\ Breuker and R.G.F.\ Winkels and A.\ Muntjewerff}, title = {Funkties en structuur van `Intelligent Tutoring Systems'}, journal = {Pedagogisch Tijdschrift}, year = {1990}, volume = {15}, pages = {270--279}, number = {5}, note = {Themanummer: De computer als simulator en tutor van onderwijsleerprocessen} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:87e, author = {J.A. Breuker and R.G.F. Winkels and J.A.C. Sandberg}, title = {Coaching strategies for help systems: {EUROHELP}}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 3d International Confrence on {AI} and Education}, year = {1987}, editor = {S. Ohlsson}, pages = {21-23}, address = {San Mateo, CA}, publisher = {University of Pittsburgh} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:87a, author = {J.A. Breuker and R.G.F. Winkels and J.A.C. Sandberg}, title = {A shell for {Intelligent Help Systems}}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 10th IJCAI}, year = {1987}, pages = {167 -- 173}, address = {San Mateo, CA}, publisher = {Morgan Kaufman} } @TECHREPORT{Breuker:86a, author = {J.A. Breuker and R.G.F. Winkels and J.A.C. Sandberg}, title = {Didactic Goal Generator}, institution = {University of Amsterdam}, year = {1986}, type = {ESPRIT Project P280}, number = {UAM/007}, note = {Deliverable 2.2.3} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Breuker:97b, author = {J.A. Breuker and R.G.F.~Winkels and A. Valente}, title = {A Core Ontology for Law}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 9th Dutch AI Conference}, year = {1997}, editor = {K.~Van~Marcke and W.~Daelemans}, pages = {115--126}, address = {Antwerpen}, publisher = {NVKI} } @INPROCEEDINGS{deBruijn:95a, author = {H.~de~Bruijn and R.G.F.~Winkels}, title = {Case Reconstruction before Assessment}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law}, year = {1995}, editor = {T.~Bench--Capon}, address = {New York}, publisher = {ACM}, doi = {10.1145/222092.222248}, page = {239--245} } @ARTICLE{Cerri:82a, author = {S.A. Cerri and J.A. Breuker}, title = {Intelligent dialogues on {PLATO}}, journal = {Linguistica Computationale}, year = {1982}, volume = {11}, pages = {111 -- 127} } @TECHREPORT{Edin:87, author = {G. Edin and P. Rooke and J. Breuker and T. Rangecroft and F. Hayes}, title = {The {KADS} Handbook}, institution = {Scicon Ltd.}, year = {1987}, type = {ESPRIT Project P1098, Deliverable}, number = {J1} } @BOOK{Edin:86a, title = {The {KADS} Handbook}, publisher = {Scicon}, year = {1986}, author = {G. Edin and P. Rooke and J. Breuker and T. Rangecroft and F. Hayes}, address = {London} } @INCOLLECTION{Eisenstadt:92a, author = {M. Eisenstadt and J.A. Breuker}, title = {A {C}ognitive {A}ccount of {B}uggy {L}oop {C}onstructs}, booktitle = {Novice programming environments: explorations in human-computer interaction}, publisher = {Erlbaum}, year = {1992}, editor = {B. Shneiderman}, pages = {127 -- 142}, address = {Hillsdale, NJ} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Eisenstadt:84a, author = {M. Eisenstadt and J.A. Breuker and R. Evertsz}, title = {A cognitive account of ``natural'' looping constructs}, booktitle = {Proceedings of Interact'84, IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, London}, year = {1984}, pages = {102 -- 110}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {North Holland} } @INPROCEEDINGS{elhag:99, author = {Abdullatif A.O. Elhag and Joost A. Breuker and Bob W. Brouwer}, title = {On the Formal Analysis of Normative Conflicts}, booktitle = {JURIX 1999: The Twelfth Annual Conference}, year = {1999}, editor = {H.Jaap van den Herik et al.}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {35-46}, address = {Nijmegen}, publisher = {GNI}, owner = {rinke}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j99-04.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:05a, author = {T.M. van Engers}, title = {Legal Engineering: A Structural Approach to Improving Legal Quality}, booktitle = {Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XIII, proceedings of AI-2005}, year = {2005}, editor = {A. Macintosh and R. Ellis and T. Allen}, pages = {3-10}, publisher = {Springer}, abstract = {Knowledge engineers have been working in the legal domain since the rise of their discipline in the mid-eighties of the last century. Traditionally their main focus was capturing and distributing knowledge by means of the knowledge-based systems, thus improving legal access. More and more legal knowledge engineering has become an analytical approach that helps to improve legal quality. An example is the POWER-approach developed in a research programme that is now finished. This programme was run by the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration (DTCA in Dutch: Belastingdienst) and some partners (see e.g. Van Engers et al., 1999, 2000, 2001, 2003 and 2004). The POWER-approach helped to improve quality of (new) legislation and codify the knowledge used in the translation processes in which legislation and regulations are transformed into procedures, computer programs and other designs. We experienced that despite these clear benefits implementation proved to be far from easy. In fact the implementation phase still continues. Adapting research results in public administrations is a tedious process that takes lots and lots of energy and requires continuous management attention. Learning at organisational level proved to be much harder than we thought.}, doi = {10.1007/1-84628-224-1_1}, owner = {Rinke Hoekstra} } @INCOLLECTION{vanEngers:04a, author = {T.M. van Engers}, title = {Legal Engineering: A Knowledge Engineering Approach To Improving Legal Quality}, booktitle = {eGovernment and eDemocracy: Progress and Challenges}, publisher = {Instituto Polit\'echnico Nacional Centro de Investigacion en Computaci\'on}, year = {2004}, editor = {Padget, J. and Neira, R. and De Le\'on, J.L.}, pages = {189-206}, note = {ISBN 970-36-0152-9}, owner = {rinke} } @TECHREPORT{vanEngers:05b, author = {Tom van Engers}, title = {{D}esigning {S}ociety: {O}nderzoeksprogramma 2006-2010}, institution = {Leibniz Center for Law, Faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid, Universiteit van Amsterdam}, year = {2005}, type = {Leibniz Center Technical Report}, number = {1}, month = {November}, owner = {Rinke Hoekstra}, url = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/reports/no1_designing_society.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:04c, author = {T.M. van Engers and M.R. Boekenoogen}, title = {Improving Legal Quality - A Knowledge Engineering Approach}, booktitle = {International Review of Law Computers \& Technology}, year = {2004}, editor = {Galindo}, volume = {18}, number = {1}, month = {March}, publisher = {Carfax Publishing}, note = {ISSN 1360-0869}, owner = {rinke}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/vanengers/legal_engineering.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:03a, author = {T. van Engers and M. Boekenoogen}, title = {Improving Legal Quality - an application report}, booktitle = {Proceedings of ICAIL2003}, year = {2003}, publisher = {ACM Press}, note = {ISBN 1-58113-747-8 } } @INCOLLECTION{vanEngers:07, author = {T. van Engers and A. Boer and J. Breuker and A. Valente and R. Winkels}, title = {{Ontologies in the Legal Domain}}, booktitle = {Digital Government}, publisher = {29 pages}, year = {2007}, pages = {30 pages}, note = {Chapter 13} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:02a, author = {Tom van Engers and Liesbeth van Driel and Margherita Boekenoogen}, title = {The Effect of Formal Representation Formats on the Quality of Legal Decision-Making}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2002: The Fifteenth Annual Conference}, year = {2002}, editor = {T.J.M. Bench-Capon and A. Daskalopulu and R.G.F. Winkels}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {63-71}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS Press}, owner = {Rinke Hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j02-07.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:08, author = {T.M. van Engers and E. Hupkes and R. Winkels and A. Boer}, title = {An Ontology for Spatial Regulations}, booktitle = {Computable Models of the Law. Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.}, year = {2008}, editor = {Sartor, Giovanni and Casanovas, P.}, volume = {4884}, series = {Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence}, pages = {86-104}, publisher = {Springer}, owner = {ehupkes}, timestamp = {2008.06.19} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:95, author = {T.M. van Engers and H. Mathies and J. Leget and C.C.C. Dekker}, title = {Knowledge management in the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration (Belastingdienst): professionalisation within a knowledge intensive organization}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the third International Symposium on the Management of Industrial and Corporate Knowledge}, year = {1995}, address = {Compi\`egne, France}, note = {ISBN: 2-9509705-0-8}, owner = {rinke} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:04b, author = {T.M. van Engers and K. Sayah and R. van Gog and E. de Maat}, title = {Automated Norm Extraction from Legal Texts}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge-Based Systems for eGovernance, Proceedings of the KDNet symposium}, year = {2004}, address = {Bonn, Germany}, owner = {rinke} } @INCOLLECTION{vanEngers:96, author = {T.M. van Engers and M. Steenhuis}, title = {Knowledge management in the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration: quantifying knowledge in an operational context}, booktitle = {Knowledge Management, Organization, Competence and Methodology}, publisher = {Ergon W\"urzburg}, year = {1996}, note = {ISBN: 3-932004-26-4}, owner = {rinke} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:02b, author = {T.M. van Engers and R.A.W. Vanlerberghe}, title = {The Power-light version; Improving Legal Quality under Time Pressure}, booktitle = {Electronic Government, Proceedings of the first international conference E-Gov 2002}, year = {2002}, address = {Aix-en-Provence, France}, publisher = {Springer Verlag}, note = {ISBN: 3-540-44121-2}, owner = {rinke} } @ARTICLE{vanEngers:04d, author = {T.M. van Engers and R. Winkels}, title = {Internettoegang tot de wet versus internettoegang tot het recht}, journal = {JAVI, Juridisch Tijdschrift voor Internet en E-business}, year = {2004}, month = {juni}, note = {ISSN 1570-2928}, owner = {rinke} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:06b, author = {Tom van Engers and Radboud Winkels and Alexander Boer and Emile de Maat}, title = {Knowledge management and the Dutch Legal Aid Service Counter}, booktitle = {Advances in Knowledge Management}, year = {2006}, editor = {J. Schreinemakers, J. and T.M. van Engers}, volume = {IV}, address = {W\"urzburg}, publisher = {Ergon Verlag}, owner = {Rinke Hoekstra} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:04e, author = {Tom M. van Engers and Ron van Gog and Kamal Sayah}, title = {A Case Study on Automated Norm Extraction}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference.}, year = {2004}, editor = {T. Gordon}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {49-58}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS Press}, abstract = {Within the (E-)Power research program a new approach for supporting the chain of processes from the creation of legal texts to the implementation of normative (juridical) information systems has been developed. According to this approach creating formal knowledge models starts with the analysis of the legal text. This process executed by knowledge analysts is very time consuming. Within the Power program an automated concept and norm extraction tool and a model generation tool using linguistic techniques have been developed to improve modelling productivity. This paper describes how this tool can be used to translate legal texts into a formal model (in our case the UML/OCL standard). We will do this by giving some examples of specific legal constructs and discuss the modelling process.}, owner = {rinke} } @ARTICLE{vanEngers:04g, author = {Tom M. van Engers and Radboud Winkels}, title = {Internet, toegangspoort tot het recht? - Internettoegang tot de wet versus internettoegang tot het recht}, journal = {Juridische Aspecten van Internet, Juridisch Tijdschrift voor Internet en E-business}, year = {2004}, pages = {89-93}, abstract = {Het internet is als communicatiemedium inmiddels niet meer weg te denken en heeft samen met de mobiele telefonie de laatste jaren een enorme vlucht genomen. De internethype van de jaren negentig van de vorige eeuw werd vooral veroorzaakt door de kansen die werden gezien om het internet in te zetten bij nieuwe vormen van diensten.}, owner = {rinke} } @INPROCEEDINGS{vanEngers:04f, author = {Tom M. van Engers and Radboud Winkels and Alexander Boer and Emile de Maat}, title = {Internet, Portal to Justice?}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference}, year = {2004}, editor = {T. Gordon}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {131-140}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS Press}, abstract = {In the Netherlands people with low income are entitled to receive legal aid. In almost every big city in the Netherlands centres for delivering this legal aid are present. Currently these centres are reformed into a Legal Services Counter (Het Juridisch Loket). This reform process has several aims, including improving accessibility, improving the quality and standardisation of legal aid throughout the country, and improving efficiency and consequently diminishing operational costs. To achieve this, the organisation will be turned into a service oriented one and new technologies, like call centre technology and Internet will be used. The Leibniz Center for Law has developed an Internet based knowledge system that should support both future employees of the legal services counters as well as their clients. In this paper we present our experiences in designing and implementing this system in a changing organisation and the impact of the organisational change on the design team.}, owner = {rinke} } @INCOLLECTION{Glassee:03a, author = {E. Glass\'ee and T.M. Van Engers and A. Jacobs}, title = {POWER: An Integrated Method for Legislation and Regulations from their Design to their Use in E-government Services and Law Enforcement}, booktitle = {Digitale Wetgeving, Digital Legislation}, publisher = {Die Keure Brugge}, year = {2003}, editor = {M.-F. Moens}, pages = {175-204}, note = {ISBN 90 5958 039 7}, owner = {rinke} } @TECHREPORT{estrella1.2:07, author = {Thomas F. Gordon and Kasper {van den Berg} and Patries Kordelaar and Jasmine Lee and Samir Sekkat and Adam Wyner}, title = {Formal Specifications of the Knowledge Formats of Participating {LKBS} Vendors}, institution = {Estrella}, year = {2007}, type = {Deliverable 1.2}, date-added = {2006-12-19 00:26:31 +0100}, date-modified = {2007-01-16 16:40:46 +0100}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2007.02.13} } @ARTICLE{deGreef:92a, author = {P. de Greef and J.A. Breuker}, title = {Analysing system--user cooperation in {KADS}}, journal = {Knowledge Acquisition}, year = {1992}, volume = {4}, pages = {89--108}, number = {1}, note = {Special issue ``The KADS approach to knowledge engineering''} } @INPROCEEDINGS{deGreef:85a, author = {P. de Greef and J. Breuker}, title = {A Case Study in Structured Knowledge Acquisition}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 9th IJCAI}, year = {1985}, pages = {390-396}, address = {San Mateo, CA} } @TECHREPORT{deGreef:85b, author = {P. de Greef and J. Breuker}, title = {User modelling for HELP Systems}, institution = {SWI, University of Amsterdam}, year = {1985}, type = {Deliverable 12.2 Esprit Project P280}, addres = {Amsterdam} } @INCOLLECTION{deGreef:89a, author = {P. de Greef and J. A. Breuker}, title = {A methodology for analysing modalities of system/user cooperation for {KBSs}}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the third European Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems}, publisher = {AFCET}, year = {1989}, editor = {J. Boose and B. Gaines and J. G. Ganascia}, pages = {462 - 473}, address = {Paris} } @TECHREPORT{deGreef:88d, author = {P. de Greef and J. Breuker and T. de Jong}, title = {Modality: An Analysis of Functions, User Control and Communication in Knowledge-Based Systems}, institution = {University of Amsterdam}, year = {1988}, type = {ESPRIT Project P1098}, number = {Deliverable D6 (task A4)} } @INPROCEEDINGS{deGreef:88a, author = {P. de Greef and J. Breuker and G. Schreiber and J. Wielemaker}, title = {StatCons: Knowledge Acquisition in a Complex Domain}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the {E}uropean {C}onference on {A}rtificial {I}ntelligence, {ECAI}-88}, year = {1988}, editor = {Y. Kodratoff}, pages = {112 - 122}, address = {London}, publisher = {Pitman} } @INPROCEEDINGS{deGreef:88b, author = {P. de Greef and J.A. Breuker and B.J. Wielinga}, title = {Kennisverwerving voor het bouwen van expertsystemen}, booktitle = {De Micro-Computer in het Sociaal-Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek}, year = {1988}, editor = {J. Hox and G. de Zeeuw}, pages = {115 -- 138}, address = {Lisse}, publisher = {Zwets \& Zeitlinger} } @TECHREPORT{deGreef:86a, author = {P. de Greef and J. Breuker and B. Wielinga}, title = {{StatCons-1} Design Document,}, institution = {University of Amsterdam}, year = {1986}, type = {ESPRIT Project P1098, Deliverable}, number = {E2.2 (experiment F2} } @INPROCEEDINGS{deGreef:88c, author = {P. de Greef and G. Schreiber and J. Wielemaker}, title = {{StatCons}: een Case Study in Gestructureerde Kennisacquisitie}, booktitle = {Proceedings NAIC--88}, year = {1988}, pages = {72-80}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {SWI} } @INPROCEEDINGS{denHaan:94ab, author = {N. den Haan}, title = {Eliminating {U}nintentional {L}egal {C}onflicts}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Conference -Towards a Global Expert System in Law-}, year = {1994}, editor = {G. Bargellini and S. Binazzi}, organization = {Instituto per la Documentazione Giuridica del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche}, optnote = {Florence, 1-3 December 1993, to appear in 1994} } @INPROCEEDINGS{denHaan:94b, author = {N. den Haan}, title = {Automated {L}egislative {D}rafting}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the workshop Artificial Normative Reasoning at the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence}, year = {1994}, editor = {J.A. Breuker}, address = {Amsterdam} } @INPROCEEDINGS{denHaan:94c, author = {N. den Haan}, title = {On structure preserving representations of law}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the German Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law}, year = {1994}, editor = {T.F. Gordon}, address = {Vienna}, note = {Invited lecture} } @ARTICLE{denHaan:95a, author = {N. den Haan}, title = {Investigations into the {A}pplication of {D}eontic {L}ogic}, journal = {Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence}, year = {1995}, pages = { }, note = {Presented at the Workshop -Executable modal and Temporal Logics- of the 13th Interational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-93)}, publisher = {Springer-Verlag} } @INPROCEEDINGS{denHaan:93a, author = {N. den Haan}, title = {Investigations into the {A}pplication os {D}eontic {L}ogic}, booktitle = {Workshop Executable modal and Temporal Logics at the 13th Interational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-93)}, year = {1993}, publisher = { } } @INPROCEEDINGS{denHaan:93b, author = {N. den Haan}, title = {Towards Support Tools for Drafting Legislation}, booktitle = {Intelligent Tools for Drafting and Computer-Supported Comparison of Law -- Sixth International Conference on Legal Knowledge-based Systems Legal Knowledge-Based Systems, JURIX--1993}, year = {1993}, publisher = {Koninklijke Vermande}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j93-03.pdf} } @ARTICLE{denHaan:93c, author = {N. den Haan}, title = {Verslag Werkgroep Logica en Recht}, journal = {NVKI-Nieuwsbrief}, year = {1993}, volume = {10}, pages = {48--50}, number = {2}, month = {April} } @TECHREPORT{denHaan:93d, author = {N. den Haan}, title = {Juridische Kennissystemen}, institution = {Universiteit van Amsterdam}, year = {1993}, month = {Februari}, note = {Lezing in de reeks Kunstmatige Intelligentie, Universiteit Utrecht} } @INPROCEEDINGS{denHaan:92b, author = {N. den Haan}, title = {{TRACS, E}en juridisch {KBS} voor de {V}erkeerswet}, booktitle = {Kennistechnologie 1992}, year = {1992}, month = {Oktober}, publisher = { }, day = {20} } @INPROCEEDINGS{denHaan:92c, author = {N. den Haan}, title = {{TRACS A} {S}upport {T}ool for {D}rafting and {T}esting {L}aw}, booktitle = {Information Technology and Law -- Fifth International Conference on Legal Knowledge Based Systems, JURIX--1992}, year = {1992}, month = {December}, publisher = {Koninklijke Vermande}, day = {17}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j92-10.pdf} } @TECHREPORT{denHaan:92d, author = {N. den Haan}, title = {{TRACS}: een juridisch kennisgebaseerd systeem voor het reglement verkeersregels en verkeerstekens, {RVV}-90}, institution = {Universiteit van Amsterdam}, year = {1992}, number = {LRI-92-1}, month = {Juni} } @TECHREPORT{denHaan:91b, author = {N. den Haan}, title = {Interview met de heer {F. S}alomon, Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat}, institution = {Universiteit van Amsterdam}, year = {1991}, number = {LRI-91}, month = {November}, day = {19} } @TECHREPORT{denHaan:90a, author = {N. den Haan}, title = {Demonstratie van {SHELLEY}}, institution = {Universiteit van Amsterdam}, year = {1990}, number = {LRI-90-1}, month = {April}, note = {Bijeenkomst Stichting Juridische Kennissystemen (JURIX)}, day = {27} } @MASTERSTHESIS{denHaan:89a, author = {N. den Haan}, title = {{\sc dermaks}: A knowledge--based system for dermatology and dermatopathology}, school = {Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Amsterdam}, year = {1989}, month = {August} } @INPROCEEDINGS{denHaan:96b, author = {Nienke den Haan and Joost Breuker}, title = {Constructing Normative Rules}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge Based Systems JURIX?96: Foundations of legal knowledge systems}, year = {1996}, editor = {R.W. van Kralingen and H.J. van den Herik and J.E.J. Prins and M. Sergot and J. Zeleznikow}, pages = {135-147}, publisher = {Tilburg University Press}, note = {ISBN 90-361-9657-4}, owner = {Rinke Hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j96-12.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{denHaan:92a, author = {N. den Haan and J.A. Breuker}, title = {{TRACS: E}en juridisch {KBS} voor het {RVV}90}, booktitle = {Juridische toogdag 1992}, year = {1992}, pages = {21 -- 32}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {VU} } @INPROCEEDINGS{denHaan:91a, author = {N. den Haan and J.A. Breuker}, title = {A {T}ractable {J}uridical {KBS} for {T}eaching and {A}pplying {T}raffic {R}ules}, booktitle = {Model-Based Legal Reasoning -- Fourth International Conference on Legal Knowledge Based Systems, JURIX--1991}, year = {1991}, pages = {5--16}, address = {Lelystad}, month = {December}, publisher = {Koninklijke Vermande}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j91-01.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{denHaan:96a, author = {N.~den~Haan and J.A.~Breuker and R.G.F.~Winkels}, title = {Automated Legislative Drafting}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 8th Dutch Conference on AI}, year = {1996}, editor = {J-J.Ch.~Meyer and L.C.~van~der~Gaag}, pages = {167--178} } @INCOLLECTION{denHaan:94a, author = {N.~den~Haan and R.G.F.~Winkels}, title = {The {D}eep {S}tructure of {L}aw}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge Based Systems: The Relation with Legal Theory}, publisher = {Koninklijke Vermande}, year = {1994}, editor = {H.~Prakken and A.~Muntjewerff and A.~Soeteman and R.G.F.~Winkels}, pages = {43--54}, address = {Lelystad} } @INPROCEEDINGS{denHaan:94d, author = {N. den Haan and R.G.F. Winkels}, title = {The {D}eep {S}tructure of {L}aw}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge Based Systems: The Relation with Legal Theory -- Seventh International Conference on Legal Knowledge-based Systems Legal Knowledge-Based Systems, JURIX--1994}, year = {1994}, publisher = {Koninklijke Vermande}, note = { }, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j94-04.pdf} } @INCOLLECTION{Hayward:88a, author = {Simon Hayward and J.A. Breuker and B.J. Wielinga}, title = {Structured analysis of knowledge for expert systems}, booktitle = {Knowledge {A}cquisition {T}ools for Expert Systems}, publisher = {Academic Press}, year = {1988}, editor = {J. Boose and B. Gaines}, volume = {2}, pages = {149 -- 160}, address = {New York} } @ARTICLE{Hayward:87a, author = {S.A. Hayward and B.J. Wielinga and J.A. Breuker}, title = {Structured Analysis of Knowledge.}, journal = {International Journal of Man-Machine Studies}, year = {1987}, volume = {26}, pages = {487-498} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Hoekstra:08, author = {Rinke Hoekstra}, title = {Use of {OWL} in the Legal Domain (Statement of Interest)}, booktitle = {Proceedings of {OWL}: Experiences and Directions (OWLED 2008 DC)}, year = {2008}, editor = {Kendall Clark and Peter F. Patel-Schneider}, address = {Washington, DC (metro)}, month = {April}, owner = {hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.webont.org/owled/2008dc/papers/owled2008dc_paper_24.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Hoekstra:08a, author = {Rinke Hoekstra and Joost Breuker}, title = {Polishing Diamonds in {OWL2}}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2008)}, year = {2008}, editor = {Aldo Gangemi and J\'er\^ome Euzenat}, series = {LNAI/LNCS}, month = {October}, publisher = {Springer Verlag}, note = {To be published}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-540-87696-0_8}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2008.06.12} } @ARTICLE{Hoekstra:07, author = {Rinke Hoekstra and Joost Breuker}, title = {Commonsense Causal Explanation in a Legal Domain}, journal = {Artificial Intelligence \& Law}, year = {2007}, volume = {15}, pages = {281-299}, number = {3}, month = {September}, note = {Special issue on Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques}, abstract = {In this paper, we present an approach to commonsense causal explanation of stories that can be used for automatically determining the liable party in legal case descriptions. The approach is based on LRICore, a core ontology for law that takes a commonsense perspective. Aside from our thesis that in the legal domain many terms still have a strong commonsense flavour, the descriptions of events in legal cases, as e.g. presented at judicial trials, are cast in commonsense terms as well. We present design principles for representing commonsense causation, and describe a process-based approach to automatic identification of causal relations in stories, which are described in terms of the core ontology. The resulting causal explanation forms a necessary condition for determining the liability and responsibility of agents that play a role in the case. We describe the basic architecture and working of DIRECT, the demonstrator we are constructing to test the validity of our process oriented view on commonsense causation. This view holds that causal relations are in fact abstractions constructed on the basis of our commonsense understanding of physical and mental processes.}, doi = {10.1007/s10506-007-9033-5}, owner = {hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/dp7567u875240308/fulltext.pdf}, timestamp = {2006.07.25}, url = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/dp7567u875240308/} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Hoekstra:2005a, author = {R.~Hoekstra and J.~Breuker}, title = {Processes as Causal Glue in a Framework for Ontology-Based Responsibility Attribution}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop on Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques, in conjunction with ICAIL 2005}, year = {2005}, address = { Bologna, Italy } } @INPROCEEDINGS{Hoekstra:07a, author = {Rinke Hoekstra and Joost Breuker and Marcello Di Bello and Alexander Boer}, title = {The {LKIF Core} Ontology of Basic Legal Concepts}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop on Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques (LOAIT 2007)}, year = {2007}, editor = {Pompeu Casanovas and Maria Angela Biasiotti and Enrico Francesconi and Maria Teresa Sagri}, month = {June}, abstract = {In this paper we describe a legal core ontology that is part of a generic architecture for legal knowledge systems, which will enable the interchange of knowledge between existing legal knowledge systems. This Legal Knowledge Interchange Format, is under development in the Estrella pro ject and has two main roles: 1) the translation of legal knowledge bases written in different representation formats and formalisms and 2) a knowledge representation formalism that is part of a larger architecture for developing legal knowledge systems. A legal (core) ontology can play an important role in the translation of existing legal knowledge bases to other representation formats, in particular into LKIF as the basis for articulate knowledge serving. We describe the methodology underlying the LKIF core ontology, introduce the concepts it defines, and discuss its use in the formalisation of an EU directive.}, owner = {hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/hoekstra/Hoekstra-LOAIT07.pdf}, timestamp = {2007.05.24} } @INCOLLECTION{Hoekstra:08b, author = {Rinke Hoekstra and Joost Breuker and Marcello {Di Bello} and Alexander Boer}, title = {{LKIF} Core: Principled Ontology Development for the Legal Domain}, booktitle = {Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web}, publisher = {IOS Press}, year = {2008}, editor = {Joost Breuker and Pompeu Casanovas and Michel Klein and Enrico Francesconi}, series = {Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, address = {Amsterdam}, note = {To be Published}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2008.06.12} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Hoekstra:06a, author = {R. Hoekstra and J. Liem and B. Bredeweg and J. Breuker}, title = {Requirements for Representing Situations}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the OWLED'06 workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions 2006}, year = {2006}, editor = {Bernardo Cuenca Grau and Pascal Hitzler and Conor Shankey and Evan Wallace}, volume = {216}, series = {CEUR Workshop Proceedings}, address = {Athens, Georgia (USA)}, month = {November 10-11}, abstract = {This paper describes experiences with the limitations imposed by OWL on the representation of common constructs in two distinct application domains: qualitative reasoning models in ecology, and ontology based legal reasoning. We will show that OWL is not expressive enough to unambiguously represent situations using restrictions. Secondly, we show that representing the idea that instances in different concrete situations are actually the same individual, is a non-trivial issue which cannot be adequately solved in OWL. Thirdly, a representation of a general situation cannot be easily reused within other situations.}, owner = {hoekstra}, pdf = {http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS//Vol-216/submission_4.pdf}, timestamp = {2006.11.14} } @BOOK{Breuker:81c, title = {In Kaart brengen van Leerstof}, publisher = {Spectrum}, year = {1981}, author = {J.A.Breuker}, address = {Utrecht}, note = {187 pp} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Jansweijer:01a, author = {W. Jansweijer and J. Breuker and J. Van Lieshout and E. Van Der Stadt and R. Hoekstra and A. Boer}, title = {Workflow Directed Knowledge Management}, booktitle = {E-work and E-commerce: Novel solutions and practices for a global networked economy}, year = {2001}, editor = {B. Stanford-Smith and E. Chiozza}, pages = {755-762}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS-Press}, note = {ISBN 1.58603.205.4} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Klarman:07, author = {Szymon Klarman and Marc Bron}, title = {Representing Definitional Changes in Legal Ontologies}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop on Multimedia Ontologies and Artificial Techniques 2007 (MOAIL-07)}, year = {2007}, editor = {Xavier Binefa and Marie Francine Moens and Jos\'e Manuel L\'opez-Cobo and Pompeu Casanovas}, address = {Leiden}, month = {December} } @TECHREPORT{estrella1.1-summary:08, author = {Szymon Klarman and Rinke Hoekstra}, title = {Summary of the specification of the {Legal Knowledge Interchange Format} Deliverable 1.1}, institution = {University of Amsterdam }, year = {2008}, date-added = {2008-01-14 23:42:20 +0100}, date-modified = {2008-01-28 00:28:40 +0100}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2008.10.03} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Klarman:08, author = {Szymon Klarman and Rinke Hoekstra and Marc Bron}, title = {Versions and Applicability of Concept Definitions in Legal Ontologies}, booktitle = {Proceedings of OWL: Experiences and Directions (OWLED 2008 DC)}, year = {2008}, editor = {Kendall Clark and Peter F. Patel-Schneider}, address = {Washington, DC (metro)}, month = {April}, owner = {hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.webont.org/owled/2008dc/papers/owled2008dc_paper_6.pdf}, timestamp = {2008.03.03} } @INPROCEEDINGS{deKoning:94a, author = {K. de Koning and B. Bredeweg and J.A. Breuker}, title = {Qualitative model progression in {ITS}}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Educational Systems}, year = {1994}, editor = {R. Petrushkin and P. Brusilowsky}, pages = {--}, address = {Kiev} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Koning:95a, author = {K. de Koning and J.A. Breuker and B. Bredeweg}, title = {Cognitive diagnosis revisited}, booktitle = {Proceedings of {A}rtificial {I}ntelligence in {E}ducation}, year = {1995}, editor = {J. Greer}, pages = {115 -- 122}, publisher = {{AACE}, Charlottesville, VA} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Kordelaar:93, author = {Kordelaar, P.J.M.}, title = {Supporting the drafting of a new Dutch National Assistance Act with ExpertiSZe}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge Based Systems: Intelligent Tools for Drafting Legislation, Computer-Supported Comparison of law (Jurix 1993)}, year = {1993}, editor = {Svensson, J.S}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2007.05.07} } @PHDTHESIS{Kordelaar:96, author = {Kordelaar, P.J.M}, title = {Betere wetten met kennissystemen}, school = {Universiteit Twente}, year = {1996}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2007.05.07} } @ARTICLE{Kordelaar:95, author = {Kordelaar, P.J.M}, title = {Waar gaan we naartoe met het rechtsinformatica onderzoek?}, journal = {NVKI-nieuwsbrief}, year = {1995}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2007.05.07} } @INBOOK{Kordelaar:07a, chapter = {Process Requirements Analysis: Towards a more legislation oriented approach for process development}, pages = {80-93}, title = {E-Taxation: State and Perspectives. E-Government in the Field of Taxation: Scientific Basis, Implementation Strategies, Good Practice Examples}, publisher = {Trauner Verlag}, year = {2007}, editor = {Makolm, J and Gerti Orthofer}, author = {P.J.M. Kordelaar and T.M. {van Engers}}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2007.05.07} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Kordelaar:07, author = {P.J.M. Kordelaar and T.M. {van Engers}}, title = {Process Requirements Analysis: Towards a more legislation oriented approach for process development}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Fifth International Eastern Europe eGov days, Prague, Czech Republic}, year = {2007}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2007.05.07} } @MANUAL{Kordelaar:92, title = {Gebruikershandleiding Contra- ExpertiSZe, Computerhandleiding voor het gebruik van het kennissysteem ExpertiSZe}, author = {Kordelaar, P.J.M. and J.G.J. Wassink}, organization = {Universiteit Twente}, year = {1992}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2007.05.07} } @ARTICLE{Kordelaar:03, author = {Kordelaar, P. and G. van der Zaal}, title = {Niets zo veranderlijk als wetten en regels; dynamiek in wet en regelgeving vereist flexibele procesmodellering}, journal = {Business Process Magazine}, year = {2003}, volume = {november}, pages = {12-16}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2007.05.07} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Lehmann:99, author = {J. Lehmann}, title = {Towards the formalization of legal causal reasoning.}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications}, year = {1999}, editor = {A.M.Tjao and A.Cammelli and R.R.Wagner}, pages = {780-784}, address = {Los Alamitos}, organization = {IEEE Computer Society} } @PHDTHESIS{Lehmann:03, author = {J. Lehmann}, title = {Causation in Artificial Intelligence and Law - A modelling approach}, school = {University of Amsterdam - Faculty of Law - Department of Computer Science and Law}, year = {2003} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Lehmann:00b, author = {J. Lehmann and J. Breuker}, title = {On automatic causal reasoning for legal analysis}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2000: The Thirteenth Annual Conference}, year = {2000}, editor = {J. Breuker and R. Leenes and R. Winkels}, pages = {123-131}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = { IOS Press}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j00-11.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Lehmann:00a, author = {J. Lehmann and J. Breuker}, title = {Towards an ontology for artificial legal reasoning}, booktitle = {Law and Technology}, year = {2000}, editor = {M.H. Hamza}, pages = {97-104}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IASTED/ACTA Press} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Lehmann:01a, author = {J. Lehmann and J.A. Breuker}, title = {On defining ontologies and typologies of objects and processes for causal reasoning}, booktitle = {Proceedings of IEEE Standard Upper Ontology}, year = {2001}, editor = {A. Pease and C. Menzel and M. Uschold and L. Obrst}, pages = {31 -- 36}, address = {Menlo Park}, publisher = {AAAI-Press} } @INCOLLECTION{Lehmann:04a, author = {Jos Lehmann and Joost Breuker and Bob Brouwer}, title = {{CAUSATIO}nt: modelling causation in {AI and Law}}, booktitle = {Law and the Semantic Web}, publisher = {Springer}, year = {2004}, editor = {V.R. Benjamins and P. Casanovas and J. Breuker and A.Gangemi}, pages = {77 -- 96} } @ARTICLE{Lehmann:04, author = {J. Lehmann and J.A. Breuker and P.W. Brouwer}, title = {Causation in {AI} \& {Law}}, journal = {Artificial Intelligence and Law}, year = {2004}, volume = {12}, pages = {279-315}, number = {4}, note = {special issue on Legal Ontologies}, owner = {rinke} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Lehmann:01b, author = {J. Lehmann and A.O. Elhag}, title = {On the automation of Legal Reasoning about Responsibility}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law}, year = {2001}, pages = {229-230}, publisher = {ACM Press} } @TECHREPORT{Kde:82, author = {Jan van Lieshout and Alexander Boer and Rinke Hoekstra}, title = {Evaluation of {KM} Methods, {T}ools and {I}nterface}, institution = {The KDE consortium}, year = {2001}, type = {Esprit Project 28678 KDE, deliverable}, number = {D 8.2}, month = {October} } @TECHREPORT{Kde:52, author = {Jan van Lieshout and Alexander Boer and Erica van de Stadt and Wouter Jansweijer and Rinke Hoekstra}, title = {Documentation for the {RDF} based {O}ntology {T}oolset in the {K}nowledge {W}orker {D}esktop {E}nvironment}, institution = {The KDE consortium}, year = {2001}, type = {Esprit Project 28678 KDE, deliverable}, number = {D 5.2}, optmonth = {September} } @TECHREPORT{estrella3.1:07, author = {Caterina Lupo and Fabio Vitali and Enrico Francesconi and Monica Palmirani and Radboud Winkels and Emile {de Maat} and Alexander Boer and Paolo Mascellani}, title = {General {XML} format(s) for legal Sources.}, institution = {Estrella}, year = {2007}, type = {Deliverable 3.1}, pdf = {http://www.estrellaproject.org/doc/D3.1-General-XML-formats-For-Legal-Sources.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{deMaat:03, author = {Emile de Maat and Tom M. van Engers}, title = {Mission Impossible?: Automated Norm Analysis of Legal Texts}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2003: The Sixteenth Annual Conference}, year = {2003}, editor = {D. Bourcier}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {143-144}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS Press}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j03-16.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{deMaat:07, author = {Emile de Maat and Radboud Winkels}, title = {Categorisation of Norms}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference Annual Conference}, year = {2007}, editor = {Arno R. Lodder and Laurens Mommers}, volume = {165}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {79-88}, month = {December}, publisher = {IOS Press}, owner = {Emile de Maat} } @INPROCEEDINGS{deMaat:08a, author = {Emile de Maat and Radboud Winkels}, title = {Automatic {C}lassification of {S}entences in {D}utch Laws}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2008: The 21st Annual Conference}, year = {2008}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, month = {December}, publisher = {IOS Press}, owner = {Emile de Maat}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/demaat/DeMaat-Jurix2008.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{deMaat:06a, author = {Emile de Maat and Radboud Winkels and Tom van Engers}, title = {Automated Detection of Reference Structures in Law}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference}, year = {2006}, editor = {Tom M. van Engers}, volume = {152}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {41-50}, month = {December}, publisher = {IOS Press}, abstract = {Combining legal content stores of different providers is usually time, effort and money intensive due to the usually hard-wired links between different parts of the constituting sources within those stores. In practice users of legal content are confronted with a vendor lock-in situation and have to find work-arounds when they want to combine their own content with the content provided by others. In the BSN project we developed a parser that enables the creation of a referential structure on top of a legal content store. We empirically tested the parsers effectiveness and found an over 95% accuracy even for complex references.}, owner = {Emile de Maat}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/demaat/DeMaat-Jurix2006.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:94c, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Automated Training of Legal Reasoning.}, booktitle = {pre-proceedings 9th Bileta Conference The Changing Legal Information Environment.}, year = {1994}, editor = { }, address = {UK}, organization = {University of Warwick}, publisher = {CTI Law and Technology Centre} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:94d, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Towards automated training of legal problem solving.}, booktitle = {Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Annual 1994.}, year = {1994}, editor = { }, address = {Vancouver}, publisher = { } } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:93a, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Developing a computer tool to train law students to solve cases in administrative law.}, booktitle = {8th Bileta Conference Pre-proceedings}, year = {1993}, editor = { }, address = {UK}, organization = {University of Warwick}, publisher = {CTI Law and Technology Centre} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:92a, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Kennistechnologie en juridische systemen}, booktitle = {Kennistechnologie '92}, year = {1992}, editor = { }, address = { }, publisher = { } } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:00aa, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Learning Legal Case Solving with the Computer Program PROSA}, booktitle = {Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2000. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications}, year = {2000}, editor = {Jacqueline Bourdeau and Rachelle Heller}, pages = {765-772}, address = {CharlottesVille, VA}, publisher = {AACE} } @INCOLLECTION{Muntjewerff:99a, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {PROSA een computer programma als instructie omgeving voor het ondersteunen van het leren oplossen van juridische casus.}, booktitle = {Met Recht en Reden}, publisher = {Ars Aequi Libri}, year = {1999}, editor = {E.T. Feteris and H. Kloosterhuis and H.J. Plug and J.A. Pontier}, pages = {209-217}, address = {Nijmegen} } @INCOLLECTION{Muntjewerff:96a, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {ROSA een modelgebaseerd computerprogramma voor het (leren) oplossen van juridische casus}, booktitle = {De actualiteit van Paul Scholten}, publisher = {Ars Aequi Libri}, year = {1996}, editor = {E. Lissenberg and P.W. Brouwer and F. Jacobs and E. Poortinga}, pages = {91-105}, address = {Nijmegen} } @INBOOK{Muntjewerff:96b, chapter = {ROSA een modelgebaseerd computerprogramma voor het (leren) oplossen van juridische casus.}, pages = {91-105}, title = {De actualiteit van Paul Scholten.}, publisher = {Ars Aequi Libri}, year = {1996}, editor = {E. Lissenberg and P.W. Brouwer and F. Jacobs and E. Poortinga}, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:97, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Learning to solve legal cases with the application PROSA}, booktitle = {Conference proceedings Educational Multimedia/Hypermedia and Telecommunications}, year = {1997}, editor = {T. Müldner and Th. C. Reeves}, pages = {751 - 756}, address = {Calgary, Canada}, publisher = {AACE} } @INCOLLECTION{Muntjewerff:99b, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Computer Ondersteund Juridisch Onderwijs}, booktitle = {De geautomatiseerde jurist, Reeks Informatica en Recht}, publisher = {Kluwer}, year = {1999}, editor = {A. Oskamp and A. Lodder}, address = {Deventer} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:02c, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Evaluating the Instructional Environment for Learning to Solve Legal Cases PROSA}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference Computers and Advanced Technology in Education}, year = {2002}, editor = {Gustavo A. Santana Torrellas and Vladimir Uskov}, pages = {374-379}, publisher = {ACTA Press} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:02b, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {The HYPATIA project. Models of Legal Knowledge and Legal Reasoning in Computer Assisted Instructional Materials for Learning the Law}, booktitle = {Proceedings of BILETA 2002}, year = {2002} } @TECHREPORT{Muntjewerff:02d, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {HYPATIA research program. Models of Legal Knowledge and Legal Reasoning in Electronic Materials for Learning the Law}, institution = {University of Amsterdam}, year = {2002}, address = {Amsterdam} } @ARTICLE{Muntjewerff:01b, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Pleit Voorbereid. Bespreking van het instructieprogramma Pleit Voorbereid van de OU}, journal = {R \& EM}, year = {2001}, volume = {6}, pages = {66-67} } @ARTICLE{Muntjewerff:01c, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Een instructieomgeving voor het leren oplossen van juridische casus: PROSA}, journal = {NotaBene}, year = {2001}, volume = {7}, pages = {29-31}, number = {3}, month = {June} } @PHDTHESIS{Muntjewerff:00a, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {An Instructional Environment for Learning to Solve Legal Cases PROSA}, school = {Universiteit van Amsterdam}, year = {2000}, address = {Amsterdam} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:99d, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {PROSA an instructional environment for learning legal case solving}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 14th Annnual Bileta Conference}, year = {1999}, address = {York} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:98b, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Supporting effective learning of legal case solving using a computer program as the instructional environment}, booktitle = {13th Annnual Bileta Conference: The Changing Jurisdiction}, year = {1998}, address = {Trinity College, Dublin} } @ARTICLE{Muntjewerff:98c, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Rechtsinformaticaonderwijs}, journal = {Rechtshulp}, year = {1998}, volume = {3}, pages = {8 - 13} } @TECHREPORT{Muntjewerff:96ba, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Computer Ondersteund Juridisch Casusoplossen. Projectvoorstel Studeerbaarheidsfonds.}, institution = {Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid, UvA}, year = {1996} } @ARTICLE{Muntjewerff:94a, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Constructing an Intelligent Coaching System to train law students to solve cases in administrative law.}, journal = {Law Technology Journal}, year = {1994}, month = {april} } @ARTICLE{Muntjewerff:94b, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {From solving cases in legal education to legal problem solving.}, journal = {Research on cases and theories.}, year = {1994}, note = {Rainer Hampp Verlag} } @TECHREPORT{Muntjewerff:92b, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Rechtsinformatica onderwijs in ontwikkeling. Rapport over het rechtsinformatica onderwijs in Nederland.}, institution = {UvA}, year = {1992} } @ARTICLE{Muntjewerff:91a, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Rechtsinformatica}, journal = {Tijdschrift Vrouwen en Informatica}, year = {1991}, volume = {18} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:01a, author = {A. Muntjewerff and J. A. Breuker}, title = {Evaluating {PROSA}, a system to train legal cases}, booktitle = {Artificial Intelligence in Education}, year = {2001}, editor = {Johanna Moore and Carol Redfield and Lewis Johnson}, series = {FAIA-Series}, pages = {278--290}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS-Press}, note = {ISSN:0922-6389, ISBN:1 58603 173 2} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:98d, author = {Antoinette Muntjewerff and Jolanda Groothuismink}, title = {PROSA: A Computer Program as Instructional Environment for Supporting the Learning of Legal Case Solving}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge Based Systems: JURIX: The Eleventh Conference}, year = {1998}, editor = {J.C. Hage and T.J.M. Bench-Capon and A.W. Koers and C.N.J. de Vey Mestdagh and C.A.F.M. Gr\"utters.}, address = {Nijmegen}, publisher = {Gerard Noodt Instituut}, note = {ISBN 90-71478-58-0}, owner = {Rinke Hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j98-07.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:98a, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff and J. Groothuismink}, title = {PROSA: A Computer Program as Instructional Environment for Supporting the Learning of Legal Case Solving}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge Based Systems. The Eleventh Conference.}, year = {1998}, editor = {J.C. Hage and T.J.M. Bench-Capon and A.W. Koers and C.N.J. de Vey Mestdagh and C.A.F.M. Grüters}, pages = {85 - 100}, address = {Nijmegen}, publisher = {GNI} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:99c, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff and J. Groothuismink}, title = {Supporting the Learning of Legal Case Solving using a Computer Program as the Instructional Environment}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference Computers and Advanced Technology in Education (CATE'99)}, year = {1999}, editor = {M.H. Hamza}, address = {Anaheim}, publisher = {IASTED/Acta Press} } @TECHREPORT{Muntjewerff:99e, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff and J. Groothuismink}, title = {PROSA een computer programma als instructieomgeving voor het leren oplossen van juridische casus. Eindverslag studeerbaarheidsproject Computer Ondersteund Onderwijs Juridisch Casusoplossen}, institution = {Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid, UvA.}, year = {1999}, address = {Amsterdam} } @INCOLLECTION{Muntjewerff:95b, author = {A.~Muntjewerff and R.G.F.~Winkels}, title = {ROSA, a model based teaching system for legal case solving}, booktitle = {Legal knowledge based systems JURIX 95: Telecommunication and AI \&Law}, publisher = {Koninklijke Vermande}, year = {1995}, editor = {J.~Hage and T.~Bench-Capon and M.~Cohen and J.~van~den~Herik}, pages = {133--141}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j95-15.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:95ba, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff and R. Winkels}, title = {Using Information Technology in Legal Education. Two Examples}, booktitle = {10th Bileta Conference Pre-proceedings Electronic Communications.}, year = {1995}, pages = {72-77}, organization = {CTI Law and Technology Centre, University of Warwick} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:95c, author = {A.J. Muntjewerff and R. Winkels}, title = {Model Construction for Training Case Solving in Law.}, booktitle = {AI \& Education conference proceedings.}, year = {1995} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:02a, author = {Antoinette J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Principled and Structured Design of Electronic Materials for Learning the Law}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2002: The Fifteenth Annual Conference}, year = {2002}, editor = {T.J.M. Bench-Capon and A.Daskalopulu and R.G.F. Winkels}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {133-142}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS Press}, owner = {Rinke Hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j02-14.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Muntjewerff:03a, author = {Antoinette J. Muntjewerff and Astrid Jordaans and Rinke Hoekstra and Ronald Leenes}, title = {Case Analysis and Storage Environment - CASE}, booktitle = {Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2003: The Sixteenth Annual Conference}, year = {2003}, editor = {D. Bourcier}, series = {Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages = {1-10}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {IOS Press}, pdf = {http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j03-01.pdf} } @TECHREPORT{estrella3.2:07, author = {Monica Palmirani and Giovanni Sartor and Rosella Rubino and Alexander Boer and Emile de Maat and Fabio Vitali and Enrico Francesconi}, title = {Guidelines for Applying the New Format}, institution = {Estrella}, year = {2007}, type = {Deliverable 3.2}, date-added = {2006-12-19 00:26:31 +0100}, date-modified = {2007-01-16 16:40:46 +0100}, owner = {hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.estrellaproject.org/doc/D3.2-Guidelines.pdf}, timestamp = {2007.02.13} } @TECHREPORT{Kde:22, author = {Agis Papantoniou and Raj Curwen and Matteo Villa and Alexander Boer and Jan van Lieshout}, title = {Specification of the {d}istributed {A}rchitecture}, institution = {The KDE consortium}, year = {2001}, type = {Esprit Project 28678 KDE, deliverable}, number = {D 2.2}, month = {June} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Peters:03b, author = {R. Peters and R. {van Wendel de Joode}}, title = {European Open Source Application Development}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the First International E-Services Workshop, ICEC'03}, year = {2003}, address = {Pittsburgh, USA}, isbn = {90-5638-115-6}, owner = {hoekstra}, timestamp = {2007.04.18} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Peters:04a, author = {R. Peters and T.M. van Engers}, title = {The Legal Atlas: Map-Based Navigation and Accessibility of Legal Knowledge Sources}, booktitle = {Knowledge Management in Electronic Government; 5th IFIP International Working Conference, KMGov 2004, Krems Austria}, year = {2004}, pages = {212-220}, publisher = {Springer Verlag}, isbn = {3-540-22002-X}, owner = {Tom} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Peters:07, author = {Rob Peters and Tom van Engers and Bert Mulder and Lisette van Duivenbooden}, title = {eGovernment Knowledge Management Using a Wiki: Design Challenges and Early Results}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Fifth International Eastern Europe eGov days}, year = {2007}, address = {Prague, Czech Republic}, owner = {hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/peters/85_peters-test.pdf}, timestamp = {2007.04.18} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Peters:06, author = {R. Peters and P. Jorg and M. Meesters and M. Hoogwout and E. Stuart}, title = {Maintaining Data-Integrity in the Back Office Registries of Cities; a Survey on Organizational Barriers and Ways to Address those.}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the First International Conference on Availability Reliability and Security DEXA/Ares}, year = {2006}, editor = {R. Peters and P. Jorg and M. Meesters and M. Hoogwout and E. Stuart}, pages = {1017-1024}, address = {Vienna}, publisher = {IEEE}, abstract = {Cities and regional authorities require consistent data on items like Persons, Addresses, Locations and Buildings as the fundament for service delivery, fraud-prevention and -detection, permit enforcement, and the effective execution of day to day operations. The concept of Basic Registries in the Netherlands is introduced to improve data integrity and the single entry for the citizen. Evidence shows that the change that comes with the implementation of Basic Registries could be more demanding for government organizations than earlier adaptations to the new ICT, like world wide web or email. Change triggered by Basic Registries seems to follow the same path as EDI did for business. Political forces do not realize the impact of this change on daily operations sufficiently. This results in a narrow focus on implementation issues, in which real basic eGovernment design issues are often neglected . Zenc implemented an action research (participative research method) oriented survey on the implementation of data integrity operations for Basic Registries in Belgium and The Netherlands. The research unveils a range of methods that government agencies apply to deal with organizational, legal and technical barriers. Early results show a number of patterns in organizational barriers towards the change that accompanies the implementation of Basic Registries. The research question is if those patterns related to the resistance to introduce Basic Registries are an indication of core changes in the organization of the public domain rather than 'simple' adoptions of new technologies. The paper describes the findings and seeks to identify key-areas for improvement and in depth research on road maps for data integrity in the back office of Government.}, doi = {10.1109/ARES.2006.78}, isbn = {0-7695-2567-9}, owner = {hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/peters/211_Meesters_M.pdf}, timestamp = {2007.04.18} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Peters:03a, author = {R. Peters and F. Wilson}, title = {Natural Language Access to Regional Information Sources}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services, WIAMIS2003}, year = {2003}, address = {London}, isbn = {981-238-355-7}, owner = {hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/peters/peters-wilson-nlp-wiamis-2003.pdf}, timestamp = {2007.04.18} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Peters:04, author = {Rob M. Peters and Marijn Janssen and Tom M. {van Engers}}, title = {Measuring e-Government Impact: Existing Practices and Shortcomings}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Electronic Commerce, ICEC04}, year = {2004}, editor = {Marijn Janssen and Henk Sol and Ren\'e Wagenaar}, pages = {480-489}, publisher = {ACM}, doi = {10.1145/1052220.1052281}, isbn = {1-58113-930-6}, owner = {hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/peters/peters_janssen_vanengers_egov_measurement_2004.pdf}, timestamp = {2007.04.18} } @INCOLLECTION{Peters:05a, author = {Rob M. Peters and Marijn F.W.H.A. Janssen}, title = {Public Administration Networked with Business: Towards Architectures for Interoperable and Retrievable Law}, booktitle = {Smart Business Networks}, publisher = {Springer}, year = {2005}, editor = {P.H.M. Vervest and E. v. Heck and K. Preiss and L.-F. Pau}, chapter = {29}, pages = {421-434}, doi = {10.1007/3-540-26694-1_29}, isbn = {3-540-22840-3}, owner = {hoekstra}, pdf = {http://www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/peters/peters-janssen-sbn-2005.pdf}, timestamp = {2007.04.18} } @TECHREPORT{Reijmerink:97, author = {Reijmerink, C. W. Verschoor and A.J. Muntjewerff}, title = {Pantha Rei Programma. ICT in het juridisch onderwijs.}, institution = {Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid, UvA}, year = {1997}, address = {Amsterdam} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Salles:97a, author = {P.~Salles and B.~Bredeweg and R.G.F.~Winkels}, title = {Deriving Explanations from Qualitative Models}, booktitle = {Artificial Intelligence in Education: Knowledge and Media in Learning Systems}, year = {1997}, editor = {B.~DuBoulay and R.~Mitzogushi}, pages = {474--481}, address = {Amsterdam/Tokyo}, publisher = {IOS}, note = {Best PhD student paper award} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Sandberg:88a, author = {J.A.C. Sandberg and J.A. Breuker and R. Winkels}, title = {Research on HELP-Systems: Empirical Study and Model Construction}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the {E}uropean {C}onference on {A}rtificial {I}ntelligence, ECAI-88}, year = {1988}, editor = {Y. Kodratoff}, pages = {106 - 111}, address = {London}, publisher = {Pitman} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Sandberg:88b, author = {Sandberg, J.A.C. and Winkels, R.G.F. and Breuker, J.A.}, title = {De {EUROHELP Coach}: Ontwikkeling en empirisch onderzoek.}, booktitle = {Proceedings van de 1e Nederlandstalige AI Conferentie.}, year = {1988}, pages = {197 - 207}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {SWI} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Sandberg:88c, author = {Sandberg, J.A.C. and Winkels, R.G.F. and Breuker, J.A.}, title = {Knowledge Acquisition for Intelligent Tutoring Systems}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop}, year = {1988}, pages = {27/1 - 12} } @BOOK{Schreiber:93a, title = {{KADS}: a {P}rincipled {A}pproach to {K}nowledge {E}ngineering}, publisher = {Academic Press}, year = {1993}, author = {A.Th. Schreiber and B.J. Wielinga and J.A. Breuker}, address = {London} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Schreiber:91a, author = {A. Th. Schreiber and B. J. Wielinga and J. A. Breuker}, title = {The {KADS} {F}ramework for {M}odelling {E}xpertise}, booktitle = {Proceedings EKAW'91}, year = {1991}, editor = {J. Boose and B. Gaines and T.Addis} } @TECHREPORT{Schreiber:91b, author = {A. Th. Schreiber and B. J. Wielinga and J. A. Breuker}, title = {The KADS Framework for Modelling Expertise}, institution = {University of Amsterdam}, year = {1991}, type = {ESPRIT Project P5248}, number = {KADS-II/T5.3/PP/UvA/014/1.0} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Schreiber:88a, author = {G. Schreiber and J. Breuker and B. Bredeweg and B. Wielinga}, title = {Modelling in {KBS} Development}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2th {E}uropean {K}nowledge {A}cquisition {W}orkshop, GMD-Studien 143}, year = {1988}, pages = {7.1- 7.15}, address = {S